I need help with English Grammar. Linguistics presumably goes in /his/, but since this is english grammar I thought it better to post here.
Which is more grammatical?
>Neither [of my shoes] is there
>Neither [of my shoes] are there
Is "Neither" plural or singular? I lean towards plural since "Zero [of my shoes] is there" sounds worse than "Zero [...] are there".
Secondly, can "I" be an object? As in "He is taller than I" vs "He is taller than me". The first sentence could also be expressed as "He is taller than I am" and have the same semantic value, but it doesn't necessarily make the first sentence wrong, does it?
Start with the Greeks
>>9172110
what
>>9172107
[your] shoes are the subject, the verb corresponds to the subject
shoes are plural, the usage therefore is "are"
idk how to describe it in exact technical terms but that's pretty much it
say I have a sentence that goes like
>...these groups of characters are isolated from the real world: group 1 is isolated [in this way]; group 2 is isolated [in this way]; group 3..
and so on. Is this okay or should I just use periods like a normal person
>>9172207
i question the use of using semicolons to separate list items that are independent clauses, but that's my opinion on style. I don't believe there are any hard and fast rules that prohibit it
>>9172110
more like start with the romans
>>9172187
So Neither always acts as a Determiner and never as a Noun head?
>>9172246
agreed
>>9172246
>Start with the Romans
>Not resume with the Romans
Are you new?
>>9172107
Would you say "neither of both are"? Of course not, it sounds retarded. It is always " is", boyo.
>>9172632
you should never shorthand your dog folder...
>>9173670
Although you're right, you should at least know the reason why it's so
>>9173710
>implying grammar has something to do with reason
>>9172110
Lol
>>9173670
>neither of both
I don't think you can have neither of both. Neither of either.