favorite passages from this?

>the nasty stench of her shameful hole filled my brain with primeval desire which shattered and dissipated in a myriad tiny pieces under the mighty swings of an undulating schlong forcefully making it's way through my insides

I like it when he uses full stops such as ".".

>>9169508
>>9169509
please stop memeing me

>>9169486
>favourite passages from pop-lit author's blatant lunge for the Booker Prize

>>9169549
>boring oscar bait
Go back to /tv/.

I like the part where the author literally stole lines from other sources but it's okay because of postmodernism

Ian McEwan is such a poor writer. I honestly don't understand the hype. It's a middle-class thing I guess. The Child In Time was absolutely terrible. There's just no heart in his writing, it's like painting in numbers but with words.

>>9170074
> It's a middle-class thing I guess.
why are bongs so obsessed with class?

>>9170204
If you were from here you'd understand. It infects everything.

>>9170221
not really a good answer?
how does it work to insult someone as being middle-class anyway? i heard this several times before.

>>9170281
Because it suggests they are isolated from real life, easily shocked, and prefer safe writing over something that might discomfort them.

>>9170318
wouldn't it make more sense then to insult someone as being upper-class? a lot of people in an industrialized nation are probably middle-class, innit? what's 'real life' anyway?

isn't this just a worse umineko

>>9170074
>It's a middle-class thing I guess.
Certainly is. Just look at the gallery of upper-middle-class characters in Atonement. The whole thing is a bourgeois wank-tragedy with all the trimmings: war, unrequited love, manners, guilt and a trite little ending all tied up in a bow.

There are literally two working-class "characters" in the novel, and all they do is witter inanely about "crumpet." They're nothing more than puppets. McEwan has never met anyone who worked for a living in his whole lazy life.

>>9170318
Spoken like a proper chav on a ladrock concert. At least you're gonna live forever.

>>9170339
>what's 'real life' anyway?
A life that you have a real stake in. Where there is every possibility of failure, penury and premature death. Where your standard of living depends entirely on your own actions.

In short, the sort of life that someone with a trust fund, or the promise of inherited wealth, can never comprehend.

>>9170830
I see you've got that bourgeois snobbery thing down to a tee. Wizard prank, old fruit.