Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
How can anyone familiar with the history of philosophy still think that it's something akin to a scientific discipline that strives for truth? Philosophy is a conversation with tradition, and a framework for interpreting that tradition in light of current social reality.
Logical analysis and autism over symbolic logic is pointless, philosophical questions aren't "solved", they are useful worldviews that reflect our understanding of the world. Every notion progress is subjective to a specific tradition of philosophy.
>>
when will these damned continentalfags get the FUCK off my board?
>>
>>9131160
When anglos develop a good argument to refute historicism, and stop ignoring philosophers who don't fit with their chosen methodology.
>>
>>9131186
Continental philosophy is pretty much entirely responsible for every trannie and SJW in existence.
>>
>>9131158
WHOA WHOA... calm down Hegel, we're just memeing over here
>>
>>9131247
Hegel was a smart dude, but he still thought that philosophy is proceeding towards a final synthesis, which is just the arrogance of his era. Marx was much more de-spooked, though he put perhaps too much emphasis on economic relations (historical materialism is based though).
There is no completion of philosophical subjects, we will still be answering the same fundamental questions thousands of years from now, and the way we answer them will depend on our historical situatedness. The analytic struggle with language was a noble attempt, but it's pretty obvious that the mystery of Being precedes language, and would remain a mystery in the perfect logical language pipedream of early Wittgenstein.
>>
>>9131158
The only reason analytic philosophy was invented is to hide the fact that some people were too lazy to actually read classic philosophers.
>>
>>9131283
>he still thought that philosophy is proceeding towards a final synthesis
You have no idea what you're talking about, shut the fuck up.
>>
>>9131283
Please stop embarrassing yourself
>>
>>
>>9131352
Go read yourself you cuck, I've no time to babysit you.
>>
>>9131352
>"the length of time is something entirely relative, and the element of spirit is eternity. Duration, properly speaking, cannot be said to belong to it"
-The Philosophy of History, p. 110.
Hegel never speaks about the "end" of history. There is no interruption to spirit.
Google gives you this information in seconds.
>>
>>9131406
Not him, but Hegel does speak about the dialectic reaching ultimate freedom, which can be seen as an end.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1