What is your opinion on this guy? He basically figured out we live in a larger consciousness system (i.e. virtual reality) decades ago and is able to explain it using quantum mechanics.
Looks like someone didn't start with the greekos
>>9129577
I've read Plato and Aristotle, but that's it. Did other Greeks discover we live in a virtual reality as well? I mean the proof available to use now thanks to quantum theory is increidble, not sure what kind of rhetoric could match that.
>>9129568
""""""(((QM)))""""""" Is a rusey red hoaxdefine consciousness
>>9129613
>I've read Plato and Aristotle, but that's it. Did other Greeks discover we live in a virtual reality as well?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demiurge
QM is incomplete, inconsistent, parts of it are highly theoretical, parts of it are highly confused by the 'relatively newly oathed in priests',
If this guy """"""""""""proved"""""""""" something using one of the highly contested possible understandings of the meaning of a concept of QM... it is closer to meaninglessness than not
>>9129928
It's the obedient little slave kid on the throne of your mind.
>>9129944
His model works. It doesn't undermine the many worlds interpretation completely either.
>>9129981
>It doesn't undermine the many worlds interpretation completely either.
Implying it depends on it? That is the least likely to be true (its 10000% a priori false, retardedly absurdly dumb), so if his theory does not undermine (impying falsify, contradict?) that would be a bad thing on his part, because the many worlds interpretation
>>9129973
>It's the obedient little slave kid
and when he (she) is the master, making the uh-oh face?