>the founder of existentialism is a christian
never liked those school of life videos
>3 out every 4 Enlightenment figures were sincere Christians
He's not an existentialist according to the current definition of the word. In any case, I don't think he believed that "existence precedes essence".
He inspired it by focusing his philosophy on the single individual and his experience of being, of existing in the world. He provided concepts relevant to later existentialism (and philosophy in general really), in addition to influencing theology, psychology and litterature in significant ways.
Not only is he a very interesting thinker in his own right, he's arguably the most beautiful writer in the history of western philosophy.
Why are you not reading him right now you pleb?
Everyone is, except a few STEMlords.
Love the Kierkegaard threads in recent times.
Great guy!
>>9121917
More like 4 out of 4
He was not a christian. He was a meta-christian.
>>9122128
You can label him [anything]-Christian and that's still Christian, contrarian.
>>9121813
I can't think of too many Western philosophical movements not having a Christian founder after the 1st Century.
>>9121824
That video was shit.
Theres a lengthy comment on it that thoroughly destroyed TSOL version of Kierkegaard. They tried to respond but it didn't go well, so they ended deleting the response after.
>stirner
>christian
>>9122229
Is it bad because it's not easy to understand Kierkegaard unless you're Christian? I doubt anyone involved in this video is.
>>9122253
iirc it doesn't even mention christianity
>>9122229
>Theres a lengthy comment on it that thoroughly destroyed TSOL version of Kierkegaard.
cmon son gimme dat
>>9122491
This plebbit post deals with it: https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/3c2dg9/a_critical_commentary_on_the_school_of_lifes/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=comment_list
>Sartre
>Not degenerate commie scum
when did christianity come back in vogue
you guys are pathetic.