>one-star review of classic literature >reviewer is a woman

File: michael.jpg (25KB, 381x381px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 381x381px

>one-star review of classic literature
>reviewer is a man

I felt this thread warranted more replies than it's getting when I made it

>>9110957
Sorry

>>9110472
>he raises valid points

File: varg-vikernes.jpg (4KB, 155x224px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 155x224px

>sardonic 2 star review of classic literature
>reviewer is Hadrian

>one-star review of classic literature
>reviewer is a chinaman

this ain't no textbook, we ain't trying to read trigonometry

File: 608.jpg (42KB, 608x608px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 608x608px

>five star review of classical literature
>reviewer is a pseud

>>9110957
Wrong
Sage

>one star review of classic literature
>review is in txtspk
>with ellipses
can you SWAT goodreads?

>Nietzsche review
>1 star
>entire review is "he was a misogynist"

File: IMG_3652.png (258KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 750x1334px

What le fug

File: 1486675598979.jpg (64KB, 640x669px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 640x669px

>>9111034

>>9111621
really makes you think

who's dat dude on goodreads who has read like every postmodern tome? It may be the same one who read women and men in a weekend while snowed in

File: 1478618471099.jpg (19KB, 367x332px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 367x332px

>>9110992

>five star review of classic book
>just talks about how beautiful the prose is
>literally nothing else about the book mentioned

>>9110977
>3 star rating
>Sebastian
Everytime.

>>9111638
>reading for anything other than the prose

What the fuck are you even doing here?

>>9111638
But that's all that maters

>>9111638
kys plen

>>9111638
Why else would you read for, mr king?

>>9111655
>>9111659
>>9111664
>>9111691
Please be bait.

File: 1486324224002.jpg (6KB, 241x209px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 241x209px

>reading for plot

>>9112779
would you watch a good movie in 144p?

>>9112915
Would you watch shit being smeared on a camera at 2k?

File: basedgreg.jpg (73KB, 512x485px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 512x485px

>>9110465
>4 star review
>reviewer is a philosophy professor who makes youtube videos
>its his own book

File: 3122224.png (107KB, 320x287px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 320x287px

>writing reviews
>reading reviews

>>9112931
Reviewing something by yourself is like jerking off in public

And of course you would give it four stars

"It's just such a great book that I wrote here but I'm not boastful or in love with myself, to show this I will detract one star. Four out of five buy it now :)"

faggot

>>9112929
This

>>9112915
Bad point. You're saying good prose is the ONLY reason to read.

>>9112929
Yes, it's called Lolita and it's the most enthralling tour de France of narratology in existence

>>9112943
That anon said how that was a weird thing to do and he asked him what's wrong with it and he didn't respond because he was intimidated by his phrasing.

>>9112929
it would evoke a stronger reaction than watching the same shit in 144p

>ask classmates what they're researching
>male classmates are all researching fascinating, unique, or at least ambitious things
>woman: "Misogyny in Rome"
>woman: "Misogyny and Hamlet"
>woman: "The intersection of misogyny and periods in Hamlet"
>woman: "Women"
>woman: "Opinions about women having sex in Weimar newspapers"
>woman: "Women in the work of Robert Musil"
>woman: "Vagina"
>woman: "I have a vagina"
>woman: "I'm a woman btw. Vagina here"
>woman: "Sex and periods in gender"
>woman: "Woman perceptions of woman, ,vagina, cooters breasts woman period I'm on my period clitorises in the work of the band Oingo Boingo and Hamlet's Perception of Clitoris Vagina Gender Studies"
>woman: "Queering Gender in Medieval Manuscripts: Your period or MY period?"
>woman: "Misogyny, Periods, and You: Ernst Cassirer on Substance, Function, and My Gay Love Affair with Gender Studies"
>woman: "Women in 'Woman's Work': Gendering Gender in the Social Sciences"
>woman: "Prostitution and Gender in Antebellum Calcutta"
>woman: "Gender"
>woman: "Sex and gender studies"
>woman: "Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding"
>woman: "Einstein contra Bergson: Who rapes me more by having existed?"

>>9112962
I really don't like to go full /pol/ but it's absolutely disgusting how prevalent this is in female students and teachers alike, it's like they literally can't think of anything else. I had the misfortune of taking an ancient history class in high school with a female teacher, and very specifically we studied "the roles of women", "attitudes towards women", "patriarchy in x civilisation" for every module of study, by far the most common theme. Even the most unassuming and modest of girls in the class could open up about how they were studying women's "issues" through history near exclusively.

File: Download.jpg (6KB, 327x154px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 327x154px

>>9112962
Identity politics are disgusting. Instead of elevating people to greater heights they effectively just humiliate and demean them. Third wave feminist insult the female sex more than than any redpilled fedora, conservative or alt-right has ever managed to.

File: d91.gif (2MB, 331x197px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 331x197px

>>9112962

>>9112962
so sad, so accurate

>>9112962
Amazing post

>>9112962
Biggest KEK post of the week

>>9112962
>"Tampons, pads, and ironclads: Stonewall Jackson and Freebleeding"

Fucking dying here.

>Reviewer is an Indian.
>Every sentence contains an ellipses.

File: 1471644608424.jpg (30KB, 620x670px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 620x670px

>>9112962
Superior education should be forbidden to women again.

File: cr.jpg (6KB, 175x177px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 175x177px

>>9112962
HA

>be me
>asked to be a judge for a uni poetry reading competition
>first girl comes up to the mic
>lean over to other judge "I bet it's about her vagina"
>her first words were "get your hands off my vagina"
>roll my eyes
>she sees it
>starts to stutter and cry
>only managed to get thru it when the audience snapped their fingers in support
>other judges decide to award her the "victor"


and people ask why I'm a misanthrope

>>9113343
How was the poem?

>>9112947
>Tour de France
I pray to God this was autocorrect

>>9113343
Perfect

File: Kyle OllozitoP.jpg (2MB, 1181x1772px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1181x1772px

> be teacher
> some racket called 'Facing History" shows up for our 'professional development'
> Balding Mexicanish sloganeer stands up to cue the 'look how much we hate genocide, give us your shekels video,' a very slick piece of normie-targeting propaganda.
> can't contain myself
> raise hand while he's clicking the lights on.
> that was a wildly optimistic message. That video, as I saw it, seemed to suggest that the key to solving the world's worst problems is better history education. Is that right?
> Well, he says (surprised but able to chuckle) it's true we do believe strongly in our approach, stressing the idea of choices and the horrifying consequences taking our choices lightly. Students learn about that, that choices have consequences and that the wrong choices can do great harm to others. History is the story of individuals making choices, that's how we approach history. We believe we can teach history in a way that provides students with a balanced framework they can apply when they are faced with a choice. This leaning will give them a tremendous advantage over others, who don't understand how to think about how choices, sure, are yours to make, but to be responsible decision-makers we must also think about how our choices can inflict harmful damage on others.
> later in his talk he says, 'we don't teach students right from wrong, we teach them how to think about these things.'
>stoned, my hand was up before I realized I had raised it."
>"Yes?"
> You don't teach right from wrong?
> "No."
>You don't tell students that genocide is wrong?
>Oh, of course. Genocide is wrong.
>So you do teach right from wrong.

Did I BHTFO or what?

>>9113308

I'll never understand why people do that.

>>9110472
>>9110465
>one-star review of classic literature
>reviewer he/she is Anglo-Saxon.
(Plus:Classics wrote in English are all shit)

File: maxresdefault.jpg (121KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1280x720px

>>9113524
forgot pic

>>9113507
No, what idiocy are you on about?

>>9113308
I think you mean every sentence has ".." at the end. Not a period, not an ellipsis, but this stupid vague meaningless bullshit that has no point but to show off how stupid they are.

File: IMG_0502.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>9113536
I'm on the idiocy of a modern phenomenon. Leftist academia bolstered by like-minded wealthy donors and politicians are nearly complete in their completion of a MORAL system under which they can be unified, decisive, and deadly. Today purely moral arguments are hidden in assertions like "this is just not what America is about," which is a purely moral assertion.

But appeals to "America" cannot contain the complex moral system the left has developed. My expectation is that this new moral system will be backed by what I would call "Our Shared Hope for the Human." Done right, this could be a positive approach that, juxtaposed with Trump, could take on a certain edge. This campaign could be totally apolitical and it wouldn't be, because now everything is poisoned by politics.

>>9110465

>shit-tier contentless post
>OP is baiting the r9k crowd for (you)s

>>9111638
Fuck you
t.Hemingway

>>9113733
You're an idiot

File: 1449153613529.jpg (96KB, 1136x720px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1136x720px

>5 star review of your favorite book
>It's a shemale

>>9112962
capped

File: terrorist-laughing.jpg (73KB, 775x553px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 775x553px

>>9112962

File: 1421254723071.jpg (66KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x450px

>>9112962
>"Einstein contra Bergson: Who rapes me more by having existed?"

File: 1474738959149.png (19KB, 377x561px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 377x561px

>two-star review
>"Let me start off by saying that I only got halfway through before giving up."

>>9113524
This so much, kill every anglo

>>9112962
>>woman: "Opinions about women having sex in Weimar newspapers"
this one's interesting if you're a Reichian but if you're into Reich you're already more batshit than a women

>>9110472
great retort

>>9111631
nathan "JR" gaddis?

>>9113343
>>9112962

why do you guys go to shitty SJW universities?

>>9112962
>be in uni
>working on an interesting thesis
>it's too hard / not coming together the way you'd hoped
>switch to something about women for guaranteed pass

i'm a dude and its just so much easier to get marks this way lol