GOODREADS SUPPORTS REREADS NOW
THIS SITE JUST GOT A LOT MORE HARDCORE
>Hey everyone look at what I am reading. See how cultured and intelligent I am. This is totally not self-aggrandizing in any way.
>>9096313
Yes, Robinson Crusoe, truly the grail of the cultured and intelligent.
>>9096319
Yes.
>>9096313
i use it for the recommendation algorithm. its how i found most of my stuff before i came here.
>>9096313
>implying i'm not terrified someone will see my lists
i just like having my books counted for me
I consider goodreads to be counter-productive. I don't want to conflate literature with stats, goals, ratings, and other stupid. I also don't want to remember books just for the sake of it. If I've forgotten a book, it wasn't good enough to be remembered.
ITT post Goodreads accounts!
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/27498265-tyler
>>9096420
no bully pls. Send me a friend request
"I just love it so much I HAD to reread it! I have such a love for books that I could consume them over and over, I can't help myself!"
>>9096385
>f I've forgotten a book, it wasn't good enough to be remembered.
that's not how memory works, helen
>>9096180
Can you rank differently for each read? Say you like a book, give 5/5, then find flaws the second time round - can you change to 4/5 while keeping the record of what you thought before?
>>9096485
I don't think that's possible. You can only relegate that kind of knowledge to the "private notes" section, it seems.
https://www.goodreads.com/gmjf3d
Hey retards, Goodreads is what you make of it. Some use it for the recommendations, some for the Facebook shit, some to keep track of what their friends are reading.
I use it to log what I have read and keep a list of what I want to read. Think of it as a Netflix queue. I use Goodreads instead of something like excel because I'm not autistic and I want to be able to access it from anywhere.
>>9096520
Why does Allie like Harry Potter so much?
>>9096180
It's about time
This isn't even horribly difficult from a database standpoint
What a kludge it's been keeping track of rereads up to this point
Oh but then
>be me
>go back to goodreads to check this out
>It's Romance Week on Goodreads
>horrible 14-word (get it?) Valentines-Day flash fiction from ostensible published authors
>I'm reading [can't be bothered to remember it coming back to this tab], so steamy
I still like the site for keeping track of my reading, which sucks less now, and for finding other titles, which these days is better than /lit/ sadly
>I'm currently reading Fifty Shits Darker
>my recommendation for Valentine's reading: The Necrophiliac
>>9096385
If you've forgotten a book it's because your brain decided it wasn't relevant to your current life situation. Good doesn't factor in it too strongly. You'll find out about these things when you're old enough.
>>9096433
This desu
>>9096542
>The Necrophiliac
kek
>>9096552
There needs to be a thread were we come up with racy Kindle romance novel titles.
It's a transparent appeal to the more vain elements of goodreads (showing people that your star rating is more credible because *you've* read the book 5 times, and also a little digital badge representing your alleged passion for certain books), but there are definitely worse things about the site than this.
>>9096566
Does it get shown next to reviews? I haven't seen it appear yet.
>>9096544
>If you've forgotten a book it's because your brain decided it wasn't relevant to your current life situation
I'm 27 now and I remember some pointless moments from when I was 6. How 'relevant' are these to my current life situation, again?
Our brain is trained to remember unique situtations foremost, if something truly impresses you, you won't ever forget it even if it was entirely meaningless.
>>9096542
lel don't know how I cut up my greentext like that
Is anyone here on LibraryThing? is the community, etc better there? The limit on books entered has been a barrier for me to trying it out