Ill just leave this here

Heh. Nice meme kiddo. But realz beat feelz every time.

File: master-race.png (54KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x400px

>>9085134
Are you "red pilled" my man?

>>9085134
>atomic facts are 'really how it is'

>>9085160
Continental philosophy is just unfalsifiable bullshit. Where's the proof? It's just making things up to sound deep. At least the analytics know how to use logic.

>>9085176
nobody has been a logical atomist for nearly a century

>>9085026
What the fuck is "continental philosophy"?

>>9085187
At one time, however, they were. Did realz beat feelz then?

>>9085196
What the fuck is "google"?

>>9085178
>where's the proof
Youre living it. Youre internal sense experience is the proof

>>9085026
This really is a pointless dispute. It reminds me of when kids would argue which consol was better. Do we all really just need to feel like we belong to a group at any cost?

>>9085178
>the analytics use logic
And where are their answers?

>>9085252
Tribalism my anon, it's the way of the mediocre mind

>>9085264
Tribalism is a part of the human condition you jackass. Youre tribe is youre tribe is mindless centrism

>>9085160
>not being a leftist via analytic interpretations of Hegel by Sellars and Brandom

>>9085232
>replying to some vague expression, "where's the proof"
>response is equally vague and only closes off

Why respond to such grand sweeping vague bait?

>>9085252
>>9085264
>>9085287
This isn't a pointless dispute and is not merely tribalism.

It takes time to study, and you can't study everything. Deciding what to study means you have to say no to some things, and that is where this dispute gains value.

File: jewscantball.jpg (75KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 720x480px

>>9085026
>yfw this is peterson v harris

>>9085197
Yes? What's your point?

>>9085026

Good analytical philosophy actually has standards set up since fucking Aristotle that follows a format that allows for easy and proper debate and concise criticism based on logic and evidence.

Continental philosophers are too pussy to accept the fact they might get disproven so they hide all their basic prepositions in a smokescreen of words and rhetoric.

>>9085026

Only brainlets hate analytical philosophy.

>>9085533
>standards set up since fucking Aristotle
>the man who justified his views with "cause teleology!"
>any sort of standards

File: dbd.jpg (229KB, 1057x541px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1057x541px

>>9085533
>"Continental philosophers are too pussy to accept the fact they might get disproven"
>autistically screeching the names of random argument fallacies you heard from your favorite youtuber
>implying this proves anyone wrong

>every analytic philosopher ever
https://youtu.be/Lz78dn2Zegw

>>9085574
STRAW MAN FALLACY!
AD HOMINEM FALLACY!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Continental philosophy is for pseudo-intellectual teenagers. Analytic philosophy is for actual mathematicians and/or logicians.

>>9085026
thank you OP, I just woke up and this day is full of hope

>>9085660
Analytic philosphy is for people who aren't smart enough to actually go into the sciences

File: android.jpg (111KB, 600x685px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 600x685px

>>9085574
>cultural marx

shit son

>>9085739
Oh gosh this picture.

File: posss.png (346KB, 1829x788px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1829x788px

>>9085533
>Continental philosophers are too pussy to accept the fact they might get disproven so they hide all their basic prepositions in a smokescreen of words and rhetoric.

All "basic prepositions" are smokescreens you fucking moron.

t. Nietzsche

>>9085660
>Analytic philosophy is for actual mathematicians
Kekked.
t. actual mathematician

File: 1282847847763.jpg (33KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x300px

>>9085574
top kek

File: 1391522088395.gif (871KB, 245x230px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 245x230px

>>9085574
>Gene Pool Saht

>>9085574
5 star post

>>9085533
>logic and evidence
Don't exist.
>proof
Doesn't exist
>prepositions
There is no way to quantify the 'goodness' of one over another.

>>9085178
Why is fallibility good?
Why is proof good?
Why is logic good?

>>9087453
>>9087468
And you people want to argue analytic phil is useless and autistic?

>>9087495
>useless
'use' is not defined.

File: 1486343319700.jpg (27KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x300px

>>9085026
You forgot Eastern philosophy you nigger.

>>9085196
its when you think about croissants and stuff

full english philosophy is better

>>9087502
ultimately this sophistry lead nowhere. it is pedantry for the literal sake of being a pedant, misconstrued as logical rigor. arguing over semantics is for the frail having no foundation to stand upon. fuck you

>>9087515
>foundation
No such thing exists.

>>9087522
My will.

>>9087526
Your will isn't a foundation.

File: putin_popcorn_1.jpg (22KB, 506x347px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 506x347px

>>9085026

>>9087528
no no no, the proper response is: 'will' is not defined.

>>9087538
It actually is, though. 'use' is not, it requires an object, and a source.

What wills? the self. What uses? can't say.
What is willed? everything. what is being used? can't say.

File: 1411992703919.jpg (56KB, 888x535px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 888x535px

>>9087551
what is "the self"?

>>9085356
what part of the post did your analytical brain blow a fuse on?

>>9085533
>smokescreen of words and rhetoric.
If I say jouissance are you triggered?

The analytic philosopher accuses the continental philosopher of not being sufficiently clear, the continental philosopher in turn tells the analytic philosopher he's not being sufficient

haha

>>9087662
Literally everything.

File: ludwig-wittgenstein.jpg (29KB, 567x459px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 567x459px

>>9087515
>tfw she's a foundationalist

>>9085026
>>9085178
>if it can't be proven to be true it isn't true
wait not even that
>if it can't be proven to be true i don't think it's true
this is the killer problem with analytic "philosophy"

>>9085178
Yeah it's not like "how to use logic" is a heavily debated subject or anything.

Continental philosophy is for failed artists.

Analytic philosophy is for failed scientists,

>>9085178
Oh shit it's unfalsifiable! Truly, that is a fatal flaw.

>>9087506
None of the western canon actually bothered with eastern philosophy except Schopenhauer who merely regarded some of it's aspects as an ontological escapade.

>>9085178
How would you falsify the idea that falsifiability is important?

>>9091341

By asking 'How do you falsify', you've already assumed the concept to be valid. You've answered your own question

>>9091347
No.

>>9090768
>analytics think clarity is relevant
>>9091319
No one is biting that.
>>9091337
Because the canon is awful.

>>9091351

Yes, you did. You even used the same word for it. Why would you ask a question, using a concept and the very word for it, while you don't think said concept is in any way, shape or form valid?

Your proposition quite literally commited suicide

>>9085252
Reminder that this "dispute" literally doesn't exist in academia. No serious philosopher working today thinks in terms of continental versus analytic philosophy.

>>9091384
>Yes, you did.
No.
>Why would you ask a question, using a concept and the very word for it, while you don't think said concept is in any way, shape or form valid?
Stop being eristic. Also start using your imagination.
>Your proposition quite literally commited suicide
No.

>>9091400
t. redditor at anal autistic department

>>9091403
>Stop being eristic. Also start using your imagination.

Those aren't arguments

>>9091459
>Arguments are good because reddit said so

>>9091459
>those urgings aren't arguments
Good for you, being able to read. Do you want a cookie or something?

>>9091466

Not an argument

>>9091480
Argue why arguments are good without being circular or making a presupposition.

Oh wait that's impossible.

>>9091459
>>9091480

Not an argument

>>9091485
>Argue why arguments are good without being circular or making a presupposition.

If you first argue why they don't

>>9091489
Why would I do that?

>>9091319
Continental philosophy IS an art.

That's ultimately the main point of contention for (most) analautists.

>>9091489
Are you alright, anon?

>>9087506
>bongo bongo land
>philosophy
pick exactly one

good memes here

>continental
Roleplaying community that likes muh feelings.

>>9085026
You understand nothing about philosophy and it's pointless to explain why because you never will.

>>9094009
why wouldn't feelings be the only thing that matters?

>>9091319
So philosophy is for failures.

>>9091384
You write how autistic people speak.

>>9085026
Serious question guys. When and where exactly was analytic philosophy born ?

>>9085574
kekekekekekekekekekekekek judging by his voice i thought he was going to be an autist sperg but this much post-irony. damn.

>>9085574
>rebel absurdity

>>9094708
frege

File: 137157319783355.jpg (21KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 340x340px

>>9085574
>frankfurt school of witchcraft and wizardry

>>9091341
A reality in which an unfalsifiable proposition is false does not differ from a reality in which the same proposition is true. Since the truth value of an unfalsifiable proposition is independent from our reality, a philosophy that relies on a bunch of unfalsifiable statements does not contribute in any way to our knowledge of the real world.
But all of this is pretty obvious and you know it already.

>>9094124
because i FEEL THAT LOGIC IS BETTER WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
>>9097662
i cant use my autism to prove something so its bad WAAAAH EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE PRAGMATIC FOR ARBITRARY REASONS

File: karlture.jpg (151KB, 778x800px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 778x800px

>>9085574

File: 1418802502366.png (36KB, 666x408px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 666x408px

I'll just leave this here