Reading Faster and Comprehend better.

>>9080404
Just read Wikipedia

>>9080413
Don't do this, OP. Never do this.

File: image.jpg (71KB, 397x562px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 397x562px

>>9080404

>he doesn't know about EyeQ

Yeah. Try spritz. It also translates to your reading speed outside of the app but you'll have to stop being a retard and move your eyes faster. Also read a book on speed reading. Only speed read when you don't really want to enjoy what you're reading.

>>9080404
you can't improve speed without sacrificing comprehension. speedreading will make you miss out on comprehension at which point you can just as well skim. only realistic way to improve both would be to read a lot, i see frequent readers are usually faster than average, but it's not guaranteed

>>9080486
>paying shekels to the eyeq jew
disgusting

>plebs speedreading fictional works

Don't even get me started

>>9080646
The level of comprehension required to read some of the philosophy, mathematics, and economics texts is so astounding, you would have to be an idiot to think speed reading works.

>>9080649
Or maybe you are so stupid that you can't even imagine reading something deep in a fast manner...

>>9080795
Nope. It's been pretty well established that the upper limit to reading speed with a decent retention (around 75%) is around 500-600 words per minute. Most people read around 200-300 words per minute. Going any faster than this would have to involve the elimination of sub-vocalisation. Eliminating sub-vocalisation would lessen comprehension to such an extent you may as well be skimming.

The best method to read faster is to read slower and comprehend more. Although it sounds counter-productive, you will develop your recognition vocabulary which will allow you to sub-vocalise at a greater speed.

>>9080795
>tripfag shitposting

nothing has changed in 10 years