Would you change it? Why?
>>9078608I would put u and i together ;)
Alphabet - no. Retarded English orthography - yes.
Unfortunately, it's never going to happen.
Do what korean did and combinethe letters into phonetic blocks. Imagine the reading boost
>>9078608
I wouldn't change the existing alphabet.
Maybe I would introduce new symbols for certain phonetic blocks that alter the pronunciation.
The German "sch" is common in many words and I think it would be smarter to just introduce a symbol like the Russian "Ш" as replacement. Same goes for "ch".
Maybe it wouldnt be too bad to have some symbols for really prevalent words like "and".
>>9078679
>Maybe it wouldnt be too bad to have some symbols for really prevalent words like "and".
Please no, one and two letters words are repulsive, thats why italian and spanish suck balls
>>9078693
Words obviously have aesthetic value, dumdum.
no bo di w an t s t or ee d sh i t w r i tt 'n lik e zz at
>>9078633
First time I've ever actually thought someone in the internet was retarded
>>9078725
How's your first day on the internet?
English needs to bring back the þorn and optionally þe eð as well.
Þe þorn is a beautiful letter þat would get rid of þe ugly digraph 'th' which is all too common in English orþography.
>>9078742
>porn
Kill yourself degenerate
>>9078742
>uglth
hwat?
>>9078742
This. If the English weren't such Latinboos, they would have kept the old Norse letters and maybe English spelling would make sense nowadays.
Time to get rid of a sissy 'u' and make latin script great again