Wut

>>9077981

Looks like a Chuck Tingle cover

>>9077981
Is that MC Ride?

File: IMG_20170208_120843_990.jpg (1013KB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 3264x1840px

I have an older edition and it's more than ok. I don't get why they started doing those shit covers.

File: Dracula-(Wordsworth-Classics).jpg (30KB, 313x500px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 313x500px

>>9078083
The covers have gotten so ostentatiously ugly that it has to be some sort of marketing strategy on their part. Maybe they did some market research and found out that these terrible covers appeal to an otherwise ignored demographic

Kike's will burn.
4chan will burn.
/pol/ is coming.

>>9078097
I mean, it gets us talking about them. When was the last time we discussed any other book covers?

>>9078112
Penguin Classics gets discussed every day

BLO BLO BLO BLO BLO BLO BLO BLO

>>9078097
Like The Assylum for /lit/?

File: suitcase kitten.jpg (29KB, 350x524px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 350x524px

>>9078097
They've got nothing on Tutis

>>9078083
>>9078097
they probably just stopped licensing paintings and opted for an in house style cobbled together from free elements to save money

File: 9780141441634-us-300.jpg (17KB, 300x462px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x462px

>>9078131
Speaking about Penguin. Whats up with this cover for Nostromo?

File: IMG_7013.jpg (27KB, 192x296px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 192x296px

>>9078824
Not as good as

Is that Common?

>>9078819
That actually makes sense.

>>9077981
Anglo Boys Getting Blacked 0: "Thank God It's Friday"

>>9077981
have a sad cum bb

>>9078819
Aren't most of these old paintings in the public domain?

File: disgrace.jpg (600KB, 796x1244px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 796x1244px

The best.

>>9081335
You have to use a photograph which will be copyrightsd or commission a photograph, unless you want to put the actual painting of the cover of the book

>>9078097
That's my opinion. The guy who said something about not licensing paintings to save money also makes a good point.

>>9077981
It cannot be serious!

File: e-1719-0031.gif (28KB, 619x1070px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 619x1070px

Why not just...Not have a picture at all?

Or just put the frontispiece in a frame?

>>9083196
>No cover at all
Man, those were the days.

>>9083196
>at laft

File: 1.jpg (7KB, 175x195px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 175x195px

>>9077981
*glass breaks*
>EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
GET SO FUCKING DARK IN HERE
COME COME FUCK APART IN HERE
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
DINO PROCESS
YOUUUUUUUU
DINO PROCESS

>>9083244
/lit/ gets stupider by the day.

>>9077981
I'm pretty sure that's the porno parody

>>9083270
Oh my god, yes! This! So much this! Thank you anon! Oh thank you for restoring my faith in humanity with your post! :-))))

>>9083337
It's a long s. How do you not know what a long ſ is?

>>9083350
Oh wow. MIND=BLOWN and puking rainbows rn. Holy smoke. ...or, should I say -- holy fmoke! haha

>>9083350
>>9083368
Why do you think people don't talk about this more often lol? What's wrong with us

>>9078025

IT'S MATTHEW MCCHOUNEUNHEY, AND WILL SMITH! IN...

ROBINSON, CRU'SOE!

RATED PG-13!

>>9077981
He looks like a man who's seen some footage.

>>9083259
Underrated.

>>9077981
Looks like the film poster for a bad gay porno XD hahhaha

File: 1016773_597251870319996_1888816362_n.jpg (40KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 640x427px

IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES

HYAAAA

>>9079017
>ctrl f
>'Is that Common?'
>1 match

>>9078510
Please tell me this is some sort of joke.

Are these people a viable company?
I want you to tell me they went out of business after one print run.

File: CP.jpg (271KB, 500x781px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 500x781px

>>9084806
>not enjoying ironic shitcovers

>>9078025
Entered the thread to ask this