can someone give me a quick rundown on this book?
>>9075325
Is this subtle bogposting?
>>9075325
Reading "classic" works of archaeology often ignores the tons of new work done in the field, i recommend against it.
>>9075393
> i recommend against it
>doesn't recommend any 'new work done in the field'
wtf
>>9075600
I mean, its a work from 1969. Its almost 50 years old.
If I wanted to read up on it, I would read pic related, and watch the recent nova documentary on stomach contents.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/ghosts-murdered-kings.html