Euclid defined something as being the absence of everything.

seems like a pretty good definition to me
you are gay

>>9071476
You have no part, fag.

>>9071469
Could you at least include what he defined as being the absence of everything?

do you mean the absence of everything else

that would make sense

>>9071947
That would make sense

>>9071469
Well the absence of everything is something, but a complete lack of everything would be an un-something, which, by definition can't be anything.

>>9072032
woah...