thanks..
>>9048854
I saw a lot of guys saying that this book is bad.
Is it true?
Its about what?
And btw sorry if I say something wrong, and please corrects me. I'm still learning english.
>>9049130
It's about tennis, drug addiction, a crazy filmmaker, and much more. You will understand it after you read it.
It's not bad, it's just a failure from a technical point of view. Reading it in the span of a week was one of the strangest and most remarkable experiences I have ever had.
am i a pleb if im finding infinite jest more enjoyable than gravity's rainbow? i'm not saying it's necessarily better. Just that gravity's rainbow was a chore at times and so far IJ has been fun
>>9049156
if you think that the enjoyment of drudgery is what separates plebs from patrish, then sure. if you can appreciate both for what they attempt to do, and they fulfill some sense of pleasure that you are seeking in their pages, then you're probably not a pleb.
>>9049136
>reading it in a span of a week
Jeez, did you just sit in bed and read it all day for 7 days in a row?
>>9049191
Exactly. I got addicted. It was about 8 hours a day, until the last day, when I read for 12 hours or so.
Same happened with Don Quijote, by the way. I finished it in 5-6 days, I think. Both parts.
>tfw only a month older than Infinite Jest
>>9049130
It's not bad, it's very good.
>13 Happy Birthday
>>9049376
>tfw nocturnal emissions
>>9049136
>failure from a technical point of view
I think you mean its ridiculous to subject readers to it. If anything you cannot take away how technically sound it is.