Kant

>>9041053
Why don't those fuckin angels slap some demons? ffs, everyone's getting rich off the soul industry

Try Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics first.

>Can I?
No, you can't

>>9041128
Came here to post this.

>>9041128
I don't know if this is an answer to my question or if there's something wrong with my english (or both)

>>9041167
You're too dumb, don't even think you might manage with my Cunt.

>>9041171
fuck me I just got it

>>9041115
Thanks, it might be a good idea to start with something shorter than the critiques

>>9041115
>>9041177
But the prolegomena isn't ethics/aesthetics. Perhaps try the Groundwork

>>9042588
Maybe you have some other recommendations for ethics and/or aesthetics? Not necessarily Kant

>>9041053
At least familiarize yourself with Descartes to Hume, then the Prolegomena, if you want to do it right.

>>9041053
I only did read the groundwork for the metaphysics of moral and it was understandable.
That's probably because it's Kant's "moral for dummies" book.
I guess you can start with that.

Dont even bother to read the third chapter though. Nobody understands that one.

>>9042872
thanks

Why wouldn't you read the first critique if you study pure mathematics?

>>9041053
Descartes, Leibniz, Newton, and Hume are all important in understanding Kant well. However Hume is really the only necessary prerequisite. I really wouldn't try to read any of Kant without reading Hume first. Prolegomena is a nice starting point for Kant.

>>9044235
I definitely should read it, it's just that I am looking for some answer about ethics at the moment.

>>9044895
Kantian ethics works are the place to be.