Summarise Heidegger's philosophy in one comment

Unnecessary

Kill the Jews

Gya haa haa

>>9006639
muh Being

Redpilled

forgetting of Being

Husserl

>>9006639
>Come on man, being a human is just intuitive, everything we do is affected by us being a human, man.

>>9006655
/thread

>>9006639
Das Sein des Seienden ist nicht selbst ein Seiendes.

Joke

>>9006659
this

>>9006639
Burn the Jews.

maailmassaolo

>>9007079
>The Being of Beings is not itself a Being.

Hmm.

>>9008547
Yes. The ontological difference. Or in english 'translation' which doesn't really work, the fact that a thing/a being IS is not itself a thing.

Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy

>>9006641
>>9008518
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU GUYS ARE ON FIRE ALRIGHT! KEEP UP THE FUNNIES!

common sense written down

Heidegger wrote what everyone knows but nobody thinks about

>>9008535
mitä vittuu penis

>>9006639
Consider a hammer.

Made up words

>>9006639
I am, I am is not

You depend on being

>>9007079
Elementary.
The fact that it is not possible to define being without falling into a circularity, thus making it impossible to consider "Being IS [Def.]" was well known before Heidegger.

The nazi succeded in giving a description of how being "must" be understood - the "must", although it appears in many textbooks, it is by no means a norm. Heidegger rather shows how Being is understood, being descriptive rather than normative.
It is one aspect in which the Heideggerian influence upon Wittgenstein is evident. "Philosophy leaves everything as it is" is the case with Heidegger's philosophy on Being, whose end mean is "leave it all in the open" and naturally looking for a less contaminated USE of Being in the Greek language, from which follows Heidegger's batshit thought about the philosophical superiority of germany.

>>9006639
Are we is?

>>9006639
Muh Juden much juden

>>9006655
this should've been the only post itt

feels > reals bc feels is reals

>>9009201
>from which follows Heidegger's batshit thought about the philosophical superiority of germany

More on this?

>>9006639
All my life? It has been for Lichtung.

is he really the end of philsophy?

or is it wittgenstein?

or am I on the wrong path?

I thought it was the being of being is inside of its being

>>9008736
Right, because everyone already knows that the essence of technology is truth, the essence of *modern* technology is Enframing.

He spent a great deeal of his career concerned to move us away from what we think already. His "descriptive" phenomenology, as the enframed analyfags put it, is just one part of the point.

>>9012269
It was schopenhauer, newfag.

Plagiarise the Chinese

>>9012297
Uh, no. I read Schopenhauer when I was like 12.

That's baby shit

monism is just another spook

>>9012305
>Schopenhauer's baby shit
>Stirnerposts
wew lad
t. other

>>9012317
>he thinks stirner invented the concept of the spook!

I'm not hating on Schopenhauer, just saying he's been superseded by heideggerian phenomenology and/or analytical philosophy

>The Nothing itself nothings
What did he mean by this?

>>9012269
Heiddeger is all about finding a new meaning of philosophy. It has just started.

>>9012269
Spinoza

>>9006652
underrated

>>9012342
He meant the same thing as this:

>We put thirty spokes together and call it a wheel;
>But it is on the space where there is nothing that the usefulness of the wheel depends.
>We turn clay to make a vessel;
>But it is on the space where there is nothing that the usefulness of the vessel depends.
>We pierce doors and windows to make a house;
>And it is on these spaces where there is nothing that the usefulness of the house depends.
>Therefore just as we take advantage of what is, we should recognize the usefulness of what is not. - Tao Te Ching

>>9012327
The concept was there, but give me another person other than Stirner who called it a spook or a haunted house
Hence, in the context, x is a spook = Stirnerpost

>>9006652
kek

>>9012403
Wow, this is completely trivial.

>>9012269
>>9012345
Athene's neuro-spinozism actually

>>9012448
Of course it's trivial when someone else has already said it.