I have decided that the absolute best thing to do to save my personal favorite artistic mediums--film and vidya--is that 95% of the people who regularly consume them need to stop doing so. I believe that the reason the two industries for these mediums are so stagnant and repetitive are because the majority of people who indulge in it wants every movie and game to be the same thing. Some of the greatest games and films ever made were great because they took risks and created things that they wanted to create. As a result, every modern game/film is the same exact thing.
That all being said, my theory has only ever been applied to literature: Most people don't read anymore. What has this done for modern literature? Is it more creative, is it stagnant, or has it simply gotten worse?
>>9001847
>Most people don't read anymore
as opposed to when?
>>9001847
more people read now than ever before dipshit
>>9001851
Compared to the rest of history directly after a majority of people were able to read english.
>>9001856
wut
>>9001856
>a majority of people were able to read english
Or you could just ignore the most popular stuff.
>>9001847
>he thinks modern cinema is stagnating
>he still plays video games
>he knows nothing of literature but makes bold assumptions
Just go away to one of those retarded boards with v in it.
>>9001856
Huh?
>>9001847
>my personal favorite artistic mediums--film and vidya
cringe
>95% of the people who regularly consume them need to stop doing so
i mean... tru
You're a pleb but you're on the right track with saying that the cancer killing vidya and cinema is plebs that want references and the same shit
Literally everything is always better when not that many people do it, prove me wrong
You're prolly woke enough to appreciate good and bad media, but not invested enough to see what the 400 Blows of contemporary media is.