>I would lead my reluctant pet to our small home for a quick connection before dinner
Was Humbert Humbert really passionate about Lolita, or was she merely a masturbatory implement used to serve his sensuality?
>>8988899
he was passionate about his masturbatory implement used to serve his sensuality
>>8988909
this
its 100% representative of 99% of irl relationships
is there a /ss/ equivalent of Lolita?
>>8988909
The quote in OP is meant to illuminate H.H.'s mechanical approach to sex. He speaks of this passion as the fire in his loins, but when it comes to the actual deed he might as well be plugging in the refrigerator.
Lolita is simply a tool for H.H. to fulfill his passion.
>>8989051
He may as well be passionate about sex. He's not passionate about Lolita till the last part of the book, where she becomes an obsession (but that still has very little to do with her personally)
He has a fetish for what she represents and the control of it, but it has little to do with her, and as soon as she ceases to represent it he feels nothing for her but mild guilt.