Is the fact that pale male academia refuses to recognize any

>>8987129
Yes

>>8987129
Why the fucking christ are you expecting a thoughtful discussion on this on /lit/?

if you're going to make multiple repeat troll threads while your other threads haven't died, couldn't you make them about redwall, lonely anon?

surely you're not lonely for idpol bullshit alone, but if you are, /pol/ won't tell you to go to /soc/. if that won't work >>>/soc/ go get your lonely dick sucked.

>>8987129
Ferrante gets massive hype by male academia. The fucking Man Booker International was won by a korean woman. Alice Munro and Atwood are both praised constantly. Tony Morrison and Marilyn Robinson are both acknowledged as masters.

Now I dont agree with many of these, but academia sure as fuck gives female authors credit, your primary supposition is deeply flawed.

The publishing industry is literally owned by white women you fucking retard

bait threads, ignore them

>>8987129
Why don't women come together to decide what is great?

They can't because in general women can't decide on anything as a group. Men make culture, deal with it.

You are correct, yes.

I recognise this but that won't stop me calling you a dumb cunt who should stop fucking Chad.


Translation: It's a boys club, you dumb female, get out!!!!

>Is the fact that pale male academia refuses to recognize any contemporary female literature as "great",
There is no refusal. The fact is that it's more common for men to be great writers than women. You are the one not willing to recognize something.

Women stink like shit out of their assholes.
Womens assholes are inherently inferior to that of a white man

Zadie Smith.... Academics circle jerk over her works and call her the Joyce of this generation...

>>8987234
I've never had sex.