I've read Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius. Where do I go from here? I'm also interested in the cynics if that broadens my reading a bit
Did you miss the part when aurelius says 'fuck reading and do something productive'?
>>8979554
Not that anon, but I assumed he meant just not to over estimate the value of literature vs. actual experience.
>>8979544
Seneca and Musonius Rufus are the only others I know of.
Not an actual stoic, but Cicero gives a good rundown of what the Stoics believed, and adopts many of their stances in his own somewhat idiosyncratic philosophy.
>>8979544
Seneca, Diogenes because why not?
You might as well delve into the Vedas, Zen Buddhism, and some Quaker Christianity (i.e. Tolstoy) while you're at it too.
>>8980105
>Diogenes
>having any surviving works
>quaker christianity
>ie tolstoy
>>8979554
Posts like this remind me that /lit/ doesn't actually read books and that I've fallen for a meme
>>8979544
Seneca. Seneca is the best stoic both in theroy and in style.
>>8979544
Epicureans have more fun.
Read De Reum Natura.