The death of God, as Zizek describes Lacan’s Big Other, means precisely that we are on our own. This transposition of the ‘center’ means precisely that at the center is either our being or a void. Life or Death. The Big Other, after the Death of God has also been transplanted with notions such Country, Family, or our Self. Of all these it is the last one, the Self, which holds over me the greatest of deadlocks. The notion of being ‘the best person I can be’ is always a idealization, an arms length appropriation to the ongoing process known as Life, Reality, Being-in-the-world. The idealization works as a replacement for the Big Other, my own Self idea a center to which I can lean on, look to for guidance, expect to live for me or at least live in my stead. The living at arms length is directly in contrast to an authentic being-in-the-world, responding to the ongoing process with all my available resources. The Big Other as Self is now the environmental support I go to. Self-support is environmental support then. The radical notion that is being suggested is close to crazy but necessary nonetheless; the self itself is an idea and the most mature way to appropriate to the world is without any support at all. This face-to-face with reality is precisely the violent confrontation that support systems have been defending us from but from which there can never be a truly unbreakable to defense. The truest truth is not only that we are alone, but that if we do not appropriate to the ongoing process authentically, if we cannot make proper contact with the way in which we are in the world as a being, then we are defenseless. The death of the Self as the last Big Other is the beginning of a Way in the world that is yet to be.
>>8978253
>Big Other
>death of God
>Lacan
>Zizek
>psychoanalysis
>the Self
Try the redpill instead, dumb fucking idiot. Preserve whiteness; value masculinity. Fuck obscurantist continental muh feels cuck-shit postmodernity
>>8978253
>Preserve whiteness; value masculinity
stick to trolling fellow holograph
>zizek
I see the fucker everyday near my college, the only Marxist that I can respect but still an idiot
>>8978740
What college? Give him a hug. Tell him it's from anon
>>8978253
I have no idea what he actually means.
So my potential ideal self is a support structure? And If i dont get rid of it i cant live life authentically?
How does one live without the "support" of one self? Just living the moment without rationalizations and goals?
Why od it? Why is it better?
The picture is very appropriate...I feel like im being whipped for trying to make descisions based on certain standards, external or ones based on my past descisions...
>>8979635
>So my potential ideal self is a support structure? And If i dont get rid of it i cant live life authentically?
Not "get rid of"- because what's being said is that ideal self is a fantasy, key word being IDEAL, from idea. The point is to stop projecting this idea. You can't get rid of it because it's not even here.
>How does one live without the "support" of one self?
It's up to you. Meaning you can go on torturing yourself or you can come face to face with the impasse/deadlocks in the way of your maturation. The ultimate "red pill"
>Just living the moment without rationalizations and goals?
It sounds like you suppose rationalization and goals aren't an automatic function of our particular being.
saved