How do I stop subvocalizing?

practice

i just looked up what this is and didn't know i was supposed to stop

>>8965869
pls tell us how to eben start practicing this

>>8965869
How do I practice? Should I use nootropics?

>>8965875

Force yourself. Make an active effort not to, and soon it will be second nature.

Why does it matter?

>>8965912
but literally when I read I word, I dont know what the word is until I say it to myself. It's immediate. I wouldn't know how to start

>>8965909
ye
>>8965914
not subvocalizing helps you read faster. you also dont look like a tard in public.

File: aesthetic.jpg (129KB, 686x522px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 686x522px

>>8965918
>reading in public

No thanks.

Also, why would I want to read faster?

>>8965917
Uh.... are you autistic by chance?

>>8965925

>why would I want to read faster

what the fuck

>be me
>go on 4chan
>someone posts about subvocalizing
>p...p.....ppp....prrr....prac....practoose? >no.....prac.... practice?
>ruh roh, have to check with my mom
>why would i want to read faster? (when i have mommy)

>>8965933
fuck me im gay for formatting poorly

>>8965933
Wait, so subvocalizing is stuttering over words? I thought it was just moving lips when reading.

Well, never mind then.

>>8965941
no, you are right, its just moving lips and making subtle sounds is for gays

i exaggerated, my bad

>>8965949
Damn, I don't want to be gay. Time to stop subvocalizing...

What is subvocalizing? Why do people care about Hume so much?

>>8965974
subvocalizing: being gay

dunno bout hume, stupid name

>>8965974
Because he is important. Also, he is semi-based.

>>8966010
Explain how he is semi-based.

>>8965974
>>8965941
Subvocalizing is hearing the words in your head when you read. It's bad for books that you want to gain information from, but for most literature, it makes reading less enjoyable as you don't feel the rhythm of the text.

>>8966018
Because I semi-like him

>>8966027
I feel this. I just like the way some things are written; I can't help subvocalizing in those cases.

>>8966068
For what reason(s)?

mostly only do this when reading poetry or anything that is meant to have rhythmic impact

>>8966094
He carries the idea of empiricism to its inheritable extreme, and his ideas are more lucid and logical than Berkeley's. However, Kant's ideas (for example, his explanation of space and time as a priori, as well as synthetic a priori knowledge as being possible) put a few holes in Hume.

He is semi-based.

>>8966156
>He carries the idea of empiricism to its inheritable extreme
Can you elaborate a little? He was a critic of Descartes, right?

File: harold-bloom (1).jpg (330KB, 1600x1050px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1600x1050px

Never forget that Harold Bloom thinks that one should read aloud let alone subvocalize.

>>8966289
I have been validated

Not subvocalising is only the beginning, I have taught myself to not proto-subvocalise. It's a term I coined myself and describes the act of breaking down pages and sentences into their constituent words as we recognise them based our perception of the words' meanings. When done right I don't even see words, I absorb the entire page in a single glance, not even thinking about what the words means, but rather experiencing what I would receive from the page had I read it normally instead. It's difficult to describe but it's a fantastic technique. I go into a sort of trance when I get going, appearing to blankly stare at the page like a fool, but in truth it is the person watching me who is a fool, as I can and have read tomes such as War and Peace, IJ, GR, Women and Men and 2666 in a single sitting of only a few hours.

fuck non-subvoc scum. subvocalization is wonderful. i subvoc and can go through three hundred pages in a day. don't trust the memesters.

>>8965926
yes, but what does that have to do with anything?

>>8965941
I thought it was just reading the words in your head, even without moving your lips at all

this is my favourite meme. it cracks me up just imagining some gullible fucks genuinely trying to stop subvocalizing to no avail and/or thinking they're a retard all their lives, kek

>>8966746
you're just trying to trick me into keeping on doing it so i remain a retard, i see your tricks fuck off

Why shouldn't I subvocalize? It isn't a race and the act of actually saying the word, even in my head, helps me appreciate prose better.

>>8965861
Didn't realize that people subvocalized past childhood until recently to be honest. I've been trying to get back into doing it so I can appreciate prose better though but it's hard when you haven't done it for years.

>>8966313
you must do it really fast then, which kills the rhythm and meter given by subvocalizing, rendering it pointless
great job

>>8966289
harold bloom also reads too fast to be able to subvocalize, so theres that.

>>8966289
Some books should be, some others shouldn't. Who could read the Ullyses if not shouting it?

>>8966865
>his subvoc doesn't transcend time, affording him leisure with which to simulate normie time perception within regimented mental spheres
jeez, you plebby lot are really lagging behind.

File: 1484101268211.jpg (68KB, 410x410px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 410x410px

>>8966311

>>8966027
Not true.
>people speed reading dense works
lel

>>8965861
you don't want to do that or you instantly don't matter. also asking this question shows you have no appreciation for poetry and therefore you are a pleb

>>8965861
Speak louder.

>>8966027
No you dumbass, subvocalization is good for texts that you're trying to learn from. Speedreading textbooks etc is not a good idea, you speed read articles and 4chan posts, not stuff you actually care about understanding.

>>8968094

>No you dumbass, subvocalization is good for texts that you're trying to learn from.

why are you trying to reason with the plebs? let it go

File: 50a.png (96KB, 238x351px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 238x351px

>>8966311
Top kek

>>8966311
The /lit/ Prince has arrived.

>>8965861
Does subvocalising mean making actual noise with your larynx?
Or
Saying the words in your head? The definition isn't clear

>>8966027
How can you read and not say things in your head? It doesn't even make sense. I can't comprehend it.

File: 1456012652424.png (313KB, 557x605px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 557x605px

>Tfw speed reader
>Tell people you don't subvocalize
>In reality, you're just subvocalizing really really fast

File: ProblemOfInduction.png (40KB, 362x322px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 362x322px

>>8965918
Because he BTFO reason. There are no rational grounds for inductive reasoning.

>>8970555
It's when you say words in your head, which produces small larynx movements. There's nothing wrong with it and it helps with comprehension by adding an auditory dimension to your reading.