Who wins?

>>8946497
Camus was a novelist so it's unfair to compare his philosophy with that of an actual philosopher

Luckily for him, Sartre is not an actual philosopher. He's a googly eyed hack fraud who couldn't read Heidegger to save his life.

So Camus wins

Camus easily.
disclaimer: I have only read Camus

Camus because he's nice to the dog

>>8946518
>Not a philosopher

What is Myth of Sisyphus and The Rebel? Besides, his novels are heavily drenched in his philosophy of Absurdism, and later anti-nihilism.

>>8946497
what a stupid question

they're both hack frauds who peddled obscurantist nonsense to fuck young pussy except Camus did it better so I guess he wins.

>>8946672
This.

Sartre seems like a cat person

>>8946518
Camus has a PhD in philosophy while Sartre was getting drunk with his buddies in Paris, who's the real philosopher here?

>>8946497
The doggo obviously

>>8946737
this

>>8946746
Neither.

Like I said, Camus himself refused to be thought of as a philosopher and preferred to see himself as a novelist with philosophical themes (like Dostoevsky), while Sartre was just Sartre, a goon who larped as a public intellectual, with the single most bananas ontology known to man

And while we're on the topic, FUCK Simone de Beauvoir and FUCK the Second Sex.

>>8946801
/thread

the publisher who makes millions when all the millennial swine still gobble up this garbage out of the proverbial rough of pop """""philosophy"""""

I can tell you who loses;western civilization.

File: bad faith.gif (725KB, 500x425px) Image search: [Google]

725KB, 500x425px

>>8946497
Mauritio Marlow-Pontius

Is it a contest?

>>8946497
Camus because he's handsome and I'd suck his dick and not Sartre's.