How can one write avant-garde stuff in the 21st century? Has

File: 145531223576.jpg (59KB, 600x336px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 600x336px

Why would you want that?

>>8942406
HNG! WHO!?

>>8942388
Not terribly difficult. Read some of the Dalkey's contemporary published output for an idea of what people are up to

>>8942388
You don't. The avant-garde is fucking shit. Your art is going to get fucking boring after a while if it's only value is in it's novelty.

>>8942500
She's 11 years old.

>>8942976
>she

>>8942982
>implying it's even a he
That's a statue of a boy dressed up as a girl, my mensch.

>>8942990
No, that's a urinal.

Please don't.

>>8943101

The sole moment in watching Adam Curtis' Bitter Lake that I thought made it worth it was when there was a clip of american educators trying to teach Iraqi women about western art. Their faces when they stared at a picture of the urinal, as the american feebly tried to explain why Duchamp was a revolutionary artist, were better than the rest of the movie combined.

>>8942388
>tfw memes are the modern day equivalent of early 20th century abstract art

>>8942388
Don't try to make artwork that will be described as avant-garde. Make the artwork that you want to –that is, the artwork that is desirable in your mind –and be satisfied with that. Whether it is avant-garde or not isn't a matter of quality, just description.
It is possible to make avant-garde art in the 21st century. There is plenty of stuff in music, film, literature especially I think, that hasn't been done. But you should only do it if you see a need to.

File: SnU.png (2MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x450px

>Has everything been tried and there's nothing left to invent?

Read this

>>8942388
make feminist blank verse poetry under someone else's name

>>8942971
>i don't understand art