[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Murakami's Norwegian Wood

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 39
Thread images: 6

File: IMG_2569.jpg (63KB, 308x475px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2569.jpg
63KB, 308x475px
Is it just me or is this book bad
>>
he didn't win the Pulitzer, so it's probably bad
>>
It's YA what do you expect
>>
It's just mediocre. I can see people really enjoying, though.
>>
>>8901884
Just you
>>
>>8901884
it's not bad
>>
>>8901884
Sputnik Sweetheart > South of the Border, West of the Sun > Norwegian Wood > Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki
>>
>>8901884
its somewhat comfy but its terrible and retarded.

the only good part is the sex scene between the 36 year old and the 13 yo.
>>
>>8902165
>the sex scene
lesbian sex scene*
>>
>>8901884
Yeah it's terrible. I'm not a huge Murakami fan but I usually find his stuff fun. Norwegian Wood sucked though.
>>
>>8902154
Where does Kafka on the Shore come in?
>>
It was recommended to me by an interesting stoner and I've been told it was like looking through the lens of your average young, carefree dude in the 1960s. I looked at reviews and it was remarked as beautiful and astounding. So I gave it a shot.

Everyone claimed to be special or troubled in some beautiful way, but they just ended up being thoroughly bland. The protagonist reminded me of Mersault, but replace about half of his charming aloofness with more meaningless, bonobo-like sex. I don't have a problem with sex in literature, but it seemed like every goddamn 20 pages somebody had to suck somebody off and it had no relevance to anything else happening. There's this central theme of people being broken, I guess? But it never delves deeper than that. It's just there, standing in the corner.

After the protagonist directly recalled the exact seventh Beatles song in a row, sometime in the middle, I stopped reading. So I guess that was what the Sixties were like. Maybe I got a bad translation, or maybe it just flew over my uncivilized cro-magnon brain, but even so, I found nothing interesting in reading about a bunch of loser chinks fucking each other gently.
>>
lmao^
>>
>>8902154
>Rating Murakami books like little Mr. Authority Figure
>hasn't even read Wind Up Bird

Wew lad.
>>
>>8902178
>>8902262

I see his books as falling broadly into three categories: the trilogy of the rat + dance dance dance; his fantasy works (hard boiled wonderland and the end of the world, the wind-up bird chronicle, kafka on the shore, after dark, iq84); and his non-fantasy works (norwegian wood; south of the border, west of the sun; sputnik sweetheart; colorless tsukuru tazaki and his years of pilgrimage), the latter of which I ranked in my order of preference.

the wind-up bird chronicle is easily his best book imo
>>
>>8902406
Tsukuru is pretty fantastical. Color auras and shit?
>>
It's definitely been my least favorite of his stuff, but I didn't dislike it.
>>
>>8901884
I laughed, I cried, I fapped. Probably the most affecting book I've read anon
>>
Never read any Murakami, thinking of starting with Wind Up Bird.
Which book has the most/best waifu(s)?
>>
I liked the setting of ennui in 60s Tokyo, the boredom of every day life and the futility of love. Also there were some interesting characters with interesting stories, like that one ex-piano teacher who got screwed over by some 12 year old girl who tried to fuck her.

Overall, good book. 7/10
>>
>>8902199
It's mostly a book that tries to give an atmosphere of nostalgia and sadness.

>The protagonist reminded me of Mersault
This shows you're a retard.
>>
>>8903819
That one. It has the best Murakami girls by far.

It's also his most elaborate novel, and probably the most influential on (shit like Haibane Renmei and Catherine drew inspiration from it.)
>>
>>8901884
It's bad.

I thought it was his worst one.
>>
File: dancddancedance.jpg (335KB, 500x704px) Image search: [Google]
dancddancedance.jpg
335KB, 500x704px
Murakami distanced himself from Norwegian Wood. Everybody else says it's shit. The only Murakami book which was actually popular in Japan (young women mostly). OP could have googled that all. Why the fuck did OP even try ?
>>
File: wildsheepchase.jpg (67KB, 500x705px) Image search: [Google]
wildsheepchase.jpg
67KB, 500x705px
>>8904242
Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki comes in as a close second though. I always tell people to start with the sheep books.
>>
>>8904350
On the other hand, his more "surreal" stuff is more popular with young Japanese men, apparently.
>>
File: murakami_waifu.jpg (20KB, 236x305px) Image search: [Google]
murakami_waifu.jpg
20KB, 236x305px
>>8903819
>Which book has the most/best waifu(s)?
Dance Dance Dance by far.
>>
>>8901884
it's his worst book and also furthest from his 'style'
>>
File: hardboiled.jpg (275KB, 1035x1600px) Image search: [Google]
hardboiled.jpg
275KB, 1035x1600px
>>8904359
Because the Anime Haibane Renmei was influenced by his dream-world in Hard-boiled Wonderland.
>>
Why do we hate Murakami and suck GGM's dick, again?
>>
File: murakami.jpg (233KB, 979x1468px) Image search: [Google]
murakami.jpg
233KB, 979x1468px
>>8904375
Murakami is too mainstream for 20-something contrarian asspies.
>>
>>8901884
read South of the Border, West of the Sun after that.
>>
>>8903819
Sputnik Sweetheart
>>
>>8901884
I'm reading it right now. I don't like it. It is readable, but it feels superficial.

>>8904101
It's mostly a book that tries to give an atmosphere of nostalgia and sadness.
I don't think it success. It shows the atmosphere, I can see what he is trying to do, but I don't feel it.
>>
It's not good, it's like murakami without the only thing he's somewhat okay at, the Alice in wonderland Borges-lite bullshit, while keeping the awful sex scenes and musical name dropping
>>
Sure is Reddit in here
>>
Does Murakami have any books that aren't twee and/or stupid?

I didn't mind Norwegian Wood but Kafka on the Shore and Hard-Boiled Wonderland were proper shit.
>>
>>8905136
see
>>8904397
>>
>>8901884
All you people should read his Underground if you haven't already.
Thread posts: 39
Thread images: 6


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.