grammar nazism

so long as any change to the language is done purposefully, knowing what the proper grammar is but changing it for a specific reason, then it's ok

if it's done out of ignorance then no

>>8896677
Let's just say that I'm Himmler.

Everyone has different preferences but I think in general everyone hates that one guy who wants to debate the fucking oxford comma all day.
Don't be that guy.

>>8896737
>if it's done out of ignorance then no
What difference does it make to you?
Protip: 99% of changes that happen to any particular language throughout history is a result of ignorance. Latin became romance languages because people were too stupid to learn it well

>>8896764
OP seems to be talking about changing the language in literature
I think the minimum requirements for a writer is being aware enough of the language to have proper grammar, so changeds he makes are acceptable so long as he realises they're changes
As for just changes in the language well they're inevitable and usually done out ignorance yes.

>>8896764
>Latin became romance languages because people were too stupid to learn it well
wew
lad