I guess this would normally belong on /his/, but I'm looking for book recommendations on the subject (unless that's also against the rules, in case I'll just go to /his/).
Anyway, I'm interesting in studying Heraclitus, and more importantly his obsession with the ultimate and upmost fundamental duality, the duality of opposites. Any authors that commentate on this?
Heraclitus is fucking boring
read Parmenides
>>8896108
Does he talk about the duality of opposites?
>>8896087
Just read all there is, it'll take like 20 minutes.
>>8896132
Ok just read everything now what
>>8896087
There are a couple of studies on Heraclitus's thought that might be worth turning to. Nietzsche's "Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks" attempts to offer a psychological portrait of Heraclitus (among other Greek figures) as a partial explanation of his work. Eva Brann has a wonderful little study called "The Logos of Heraclitus" that explains the duality of opposites by H.'s discussions of logos as a kind of principle.
And then there's the classicist Seth Benardete's difficult but penetrating essay on Heraclitus's fragments which you can read at the following link:
http://library.newschool.edu/files/findingaids/benardete/SB_03_06_On_Heraclitus.pdf
>>8896118
heh...
>>8896307
Thank you very much!