Is sexual desire a spook?

>>8880864
if it isn't physical, it's a spook

so yes

It is if it controls the ego more than ego controls it, like the other spooks.

Not to mention it allows others to manipulate the ego.

>>8880870
Thats not true. None of you have even read Stirner I bet.

File: 1480106428917.png (137KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 640x480px

>>8880864
>It is if it controls the ego more than ego controls it

Hoh boy, looks like another "Philosophy" is taken down by Siggy Angeldust

>laying naked on a wooden floor

yucky

File: stirner_punch.png (51KB, 694x364px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 694x364px

>The impure man renounces all “better feelings,” all shame, even natural timidity, and follows only the appetite that rules him. The pure man renounces his natural relation to the world (“renounces the world”) and follows only the “desire” which rules him.
>Driven by the thirst for money, the avaricious man renounces all admonitions of conscience, all feeling of honor, all gentleness and all compassion; he puts all considerations out of sight; the appetite drags him along. The holy man behaves similarly. He makes himself the “laughing-stock of the world,” is hard-hearted and “strictly just”; for the desire drags him along.
>As the unholy man renounces himself before Mammon, so the holy man renounces himself before God and the divine laws.
>The self-renouncers must, as holy men, take the same course that they do so as unholy men; as the latter little by little sink to the fullest measure of self-renouncing vulgarity and lowness, so the former must ascend to the most dishonorable exaltation. The mammon of the earth and the God of heaven both demand exactly the same degree of — self-renunciation.
Fuck off, I want to be free.

>>8880864

No, moron. It's a biological imperative.
It can become a spook but it isn't inherently a spook.

>>8880942
>>8880881
Can it become a spook?
Its not possible to divide the ego from sexuality, so how can we speak of it controlling the ego?

>>8880902
I am upset at how much of a virgin you are.

"Spooks" is one of the most retarded nebulous ideas in all of philosophy
>hurr only you matter everything else is le spook
Stirner himself even fell for the "freedom" and "equality" spooks.

>A spook
I'm late to the party, what?

>>8880953
>Its not possible to divide the ego from sexuality
For starters I try not to think too much with my penis.

>how can we speak of it controlling the ego?
Because if I'm addicted, I'm not the one in control.

I'll fuck what I will, but won't renounce myself. Read >>8880915

>>8880968
>equality
He does nothing but shit on it.

>>8880969
Don't join the party until you read Max Stirner's Ego and His Own.

>>8880973
"Horniness" isn't the extent of how sexuality affects the ego. We're talking the tip of the iceberg here

This is the type of post I would expect during the summer. Winter-/lit/ is better than this

>>8880977
Indeed; we're talking about desire ITT, my property.

>>8880980
Its summer where I live

>>8880991
>Spics and Australians

You need to go

>>8880991
Southern Hemisphere need not apply

lol idk what spook means