Was Kant right?

nah i have access to the thing in itself and trust me it's so awesome

>>8855880
Is OP a fgt?

Hegel was more right

where do kant and hegel differ

>>8855880
We Kant be sure.

>>8855937
Not well read on hegel/kant but:

Kant said things had an essence of "thing in of itself". Sort of an absolute essence, independent of what we perceive of it.

Hegel was like naw things can contradict themselves and be in an in-between grey area.

>>8855880
Yes

>>8855938
REEEEEEEEEEEE THAT WAS BARELY BELOW AVERAGE HEIGHT FOR THE TIME

>>8855980

the only time this pun has ever also been a good joke

>>8856378
well then maybe we shouldn't take people from that time seriously

>>8855998

i would say that it's more like there is, in kant, a noumenal object that perpetually recedes from every subjective and categorical apprehension of it. for hegel, meanwhile, the object has both appearance and essence, but the dialectical twist is that rather than the appearance obscuring the essence, in fact it turns out that the essence is incomprehensible without absolute appreciation of the appearance's emergence from it—one cannot understand, for instance, capital without understanding money and equivalent exchange.

File: images.jpg (18KB, 326x451px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 326x451px

No, he was left.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUWK_pWrbw

The distinction between categorical and hypothetical imperatives is fucking genius.

>>8855938
>tfw you successfully forced this image
maybe manlets will finally learn

>>8857279
that they're geniuses?

>>8855880
Yes. He was a very disciplined, exact and perfectionistic Prussian how could he be wrong.