Anyone in /lit/ read this? I'm reading it in english and need your thoughts on it. I can't seem to get so deep into it, the language is hard to understand
>>8851559
It's very good.
Hope this helps
Isn't this book loaded with ebonics?
>>8851622
>published in 1937
>affirmative action
>>8851622
to clarify, it's not that bad, but I'm salty we wasted my high school english classes reading stuff like this, Eli Wiesel's "Night", along with other assorted mediocrities instead of the classics.
The only book I enjoyed from high school English was "Of Mice and Men"
>>8851659
obviously I was referring to affirmative action as why it's placed in high school curricula, instead of Faulkner or Joyce, or any of the greats we passed up on.
>>8851622
Kill yourself
>>8851660
I feel like we went to school together
>>8851660
Really?
All I got from Of Mice and Men was fluff.
>>8851660
The classic fucking "If you don't like these books, you're a racist!" reading lists. Hated that shit. Ellison's Invisible Man was the only one worth a shit and I still didn't dig it at all.
>>8851559She has an orgasm when she's by the tree and she goes looking for a man who'll make her feel that good.
>>8851559
Just take your time bro, pace yourself.
>>8851559
fuck off 11th grader
>>8855242
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU-6ioKKYHY
>>8855251
I am not good at Russian, and he speaks p fast.
>>8851559
garbage
>negro """literature""""
Actually I just wrote a literature review on it last night.
I thought it was beautiful. And the critical material about structure/narrative was cool.
>>8851559
Why are you posting the fake version of the book cover?