Which philosophers argue in favour of suicide?

>>8840079
Virgins

Cioran and Wittgenstein

>>8840079
According to Kant it may be reasonable under certain circumstances at least.

>>8840096
Same according to Seneca

>>8840096
>>8840102

What circumstances do these guys give that makes it permissible (or maybe permissible)?

>>8840096
Same according to Nietzsche.

>>8840107
When you aren't living anymore.

>rules

>>8840107
When your freedom is ineluctably compromised

>>8840079
Hegesias.

>>8840117

Is that for Seneca or for Kant?

When is your freedom ever ineluctably compromised? Even in a prison camp you can try to resist, or hope for change, I guess.

>>8840086
>Wittgenstein
that's false

>>8840125
For Seneca. Check out why and how he, Cato the Younger, Hannibal, Lucretius, Mark Antony (and others I can't remember) committed suicide.

>>8840079
Philosophy is a form of suicide.

>>8840146

Your shitposts are a form of retardation.

>>8840154
this

Not a philosopher per se, but Thomas Ligotti.

>>8840107
when there is nothing for you in life other than senseless pain and there is nothing to stop it

The Stoics felt it was perfectly reasonable, but they viewed it as a sort of contingency for if you should simply be unable to live a happy life.

>>8840154

so geht es (._.)

>>8840079
Based Mainländer