Was Philip K. Dick a genius or a hack?
>dichotomies
Saged, reported to the episteme police
>>8805678
hack genius
>>8805678
He wasn't special. Many scifi writers do all the same drugs and have all the same influences and experiences but most just avoid making their book universe run around the drugs. He managed to do it and mostly not make it too cheap and shallow.
>>8805678
most of his books arent full of interesting ideas, so no to being a genius
i wouldn't say he was either. he started as a competent writer then slowly lost his mind for our enjoyment. he's fun to read and that's all that matters.
>>8805686
This. The two are by no means mutually exclusive.
>>8805790
He was a conspiracy religious nut that thought people were out to get him. He was special.
he was a robot. i thought everyone knew that.
>>8806557
fuck me, that's meta af
I read a few of his books back when I did a lot of acid and thought he was a real neat dude
Genius though we all have our flaws
pkdpp.tumblr.com
he was a dick.
>>8808412
genius lol xDDDDD you should rite for SNL!
>>8805678
Absolute genius. He predicted so many inventions in his books.
A Scanner Darkly is one of the most accurate books about drug addiction, and a great insight into 70s hard drug culture in California even though it's set in the future.
I like him in general but "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" sucks.
>>8805678
Both. Some of its commercial work done quickly for cash, some of it is art.
This is not an uncommon pattern of output for many much greater artists.
Check out Mozart doodling on autopilot, if you get one of those complete sets with hundreds of hours of complete rubbish hardly anyone records or listens to now.
Some even say you can chop Shakespeare's output up like this too.
>>8808548
why?
Hack bitch
>A Scanner Darkly
>Ubik
>The Three stigmata of Palmer Eldritch
>best shit
>K. Dick confirmed genius