why are they more expensive? seems to suggest they're more desirable. why? they're uncomfy. because they last longer? what's the dicky-licky?
>>8766726
They don't look like shit after 2 or 3 reads.
>>8766752
but who is reading hardcovers 2-3 times? that'd suck dick
>>8766726
quite on the contrary i would say
if the hardcover is decently sized
you don't have to deal with ugly broken spines
you don't have to deal as much with not getting your hands on the paper
and you don't have to look out to not "bend" the paper
>>8766772
I deliberately crack the spines of my paperbacks so people know I've read them.
>>8766726
The way they make the spine is more expensive along with a smaller print
>>8766858
Please be joking.
>>8766889
he wouldn't be the first person on lit /lit/ who has to brag about what he reads
>>8766726
>Gutenberg press phone to ear