what book has the best cover of all time?
>>8763306
>>8763557
seen the one for beyond good and evil?
kevin tong, based as fuck
>>8763610
That's stunning.
>>8763832
*tips bookmark*
>>8763306
>tfw you have the Wordsworth classic edition
o i am cryin
I'm surprised nobody has posted that gay TBK cover yet. I don't even know if its real kek
My unironic submission. The classical statue illustrated in a decidedly modernist style set against the backdrop of a cartoonish set with the curtains dropping behind it is, perhaps, the best visual summation of a novel i've ever seen.
It's excellence only becomes apparent after reading the book which IMO is a good quality for a cover to have.
>>8763775
Jesus Christ, no.
OK OP. I think Gatsby is a good, not a great, novel. But that cover is among the all-time greats. Truly a great work of design. Here is my vote. .
>>8763306
Books shouldn't have anything on their covers but plain white and the title.
>>8765679
>implying the cover isn't a contributory element of the unity of purpose of a novel
>>8765679
Relax anon, have a beer.
>>8765539
literally Cat in the Hat
>>8763775
lmao just looks like the non halloween version of this
>>8765686
this
like it or not, the cover is part of the book, and its quality reflects on its content
shitty books dont get nice editions
>>8765692
dr seuss is patrish
It's ogre.
This.
Was actually illustrated by the author.
you're supposed to take the cover jacket off, it's like a candy wrapper
I find this one particularly satisfying
>>8763775
Sweet Jesus why
>>8766051
Its meant to keep dust off because its a dust jacket
>>8765679
Seconded.
>tfw Gallimard covers are GOAT but you don't speak French
>>8766050
C A R C O S A
A
R
C
O
S
A
>>8766697
>six walks
>only 4 books visible
>>8766716
iktf
gallimard makes me gallihard
>>8766721
look harder
>>8765679
that...makes a lot of sense
>>8765520
pablos illustrations are the best
>>8765679
Patrician opinion.
>>8763832
its true those are some man child tier covers. My favourite cover for BG&E is pic related.