What are /lit/ thoughts on this?

>>8754336
>reading tranlations

>>8754356
I thought the attack on leftism in the book was interesting too.

>>8754365
Let's face it, they're simply immature of mind compared to us

>>8754336
Economics schools ranked

>God Tier
Austrian
>ok tier
Neoclassical
>Shit tier
Keynesian
>good goyim tier
Marxist

>>8754389
The truth is that leftism appeals to people with low testosterone and no grasp on economics

>>8754389
Is that God like how certain Atheists view God? Like Austrian is p much retarded, and neoclassical a little less retarded.

>>8754392
and right wing ideology appeals to dullards

>>8754416
Lol, we value FACTS, and RATIONALITY, and REASON, and LOGICALITY.

File: retards.png (278KB, 456x343px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 456x343px

>>8754389

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when people still talking about """Austrian economics"""" in 2016 like it's serious

>>8754422
>LOGICALITY

non-native english speaker confirmed

File: 1479543827671.jpg (65KB, 490x703px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 490x703px

Whats some decent literature that is neither neoclassical or anti-capital? Like the fabled "economic mationalism" Bannon was quoted as identifying as? Something critical of unfettered international markets, pragmatic national interest, ethically pro-labor but not divisively anti-capital?

>>8754432
>mationalism
Fuck

>>8754422
What right wing would this be?

>>8754439
The redpill

>>8754416
In the days of Tertullian, being a Christian was very avant-garde. The hicks (pagani) in the backwoods (pagus) just didn't get it.

And once the Christians monopolised all culture and education, the only literates were Christian.

Now, I used the word Christian several times, but don't get confused; I'm an atheist. What I'm trying to convey is that ideology is interchangeable.

Leftism is the ideology of today's limp-wristed city dwellers. It will be replaced in turn, and by then the only leftists will be excluded, poor, uneducated hicks, always centuries behind the times.

Marx's mistake was saying the working class, if left with the ultimate choice, should side with liberal democracy over the conservatism when commenting on Bismark

I don't get most of the right-wing criticism on this book. His ideological position, as he clearly states many times, is the defence of democracy and meritocracy.
He is basically trying to save capitalism and, as far as I know, with better data than anyone else before.

>>8754356
> Leftism is disgusting
>Only for brainwashed retards who hate strength and masculinity

This is pretty spot on.

>>8754514
>He is basically trying to save capitalism
fact. when given the choice between 'saving capitalism' and fascism/mass psychosis/total annihilation the average human will choose the later 9 times out of ten

>>8754426
I mean you are on /lit/ of all places. Not many good places on the internet to discuss economics though.

>>8754389
>Austrian economics

>>8754392
>Suggesting Austrian economics are in any way reasonable.

>>8754416
Pretty much.

>>8754422
The sad thing is many of them actually believe this.

>>8754431
>poor reading comprehension confirmed.

>>8754521
>falling for the alt right

>>8754389
>Austrian "economics"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression

Piketty's critiques are good, but his fixes range between idealistic and fairy tale.

Based. I've read most of it, and used a lot of it in my economics papers for uni, so I've studied a lot of his stuff. Its really fucking great desu. If you don't want to read all of the dry stuff, skip to the chapters on labor income inequality and capital income inequality, then the chapter on marginal tax rates + the remaining conclusions/policy recs.

He a little too far left for my taste, but I really like his ideas and he red-pilled me on a lot of leftist economic policies (which before I naively thought were stupid).

>>8754389
Flip the first three.

(((Austrian))) is on par with marxism with how shit it is.