Now that the dust has settled, who was the superior one?

>>8707426

How is Bolaño comparable to the other two? Not trolling, I'm a bit into Savage Detectives right now and don't understand how he can be compared to Borges. I haven't read any Cortazar though.

>>8707439
It's not just this shit thread, on the other Bolaño thread someone also claims that he's similar to Borges.

>>8707432
2666 is very good, in the original spanish it's better than the english version.Borges is very nice to read in english.

>>8707426
The one that influenced the other two

File: 3337-1-12_33_42.png (365KB, 731x1145px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 731x1145px

>>8707426
This guy

>>8707696
literally who

The other two don't exist with Borges

>>8707700
Fuck you bitch
only the greatest writer in Latin America

>>8707700
>Pleb

>>8707706
>>8707707
Sorry, the memeing was uncalled for
Are any of his books as good as Pedro Paramo?

>>8707713
El llano en llamas
Great short stories collection, amazing book really.

>>8707713
He only has two other books. The short story collection El llano en llamas (probaly one of the greatest collections i've ever read) and El gallo de oro, which no one talks about, for reasons unknown to me, and which i have not read
Pedro Páramo is his best, but El llano en llamas doesn't fall behind either

>>8707722
Nobody talks much about El Gallo de Oro because it was scrapped and transformed into a movie script. And the two who adapted the novel were non other than Gabriel García Marquez and Carlos Fuentes. Rulfo wrote for other movies aswell.