Literally who
>>8688613
Lee Child
Modern day Graham Greene.
>>8688584
>
Seems like he's just another Patterson/Koontz/King hack.
>>8688708
tfw this board is full of frauds that read 2-3 books a year
>>8688725
It's my first year of serious reading and I've read 56 books that aren't crap you get offended over. Pleb.
>>8688725
tfw this board if full of zica babies that read mystery hacks
>>8688584
my diary desu
>a favourite Lee Child isn't totally arbitrary because all his books are the exact same
>>8689378
Could say the same thing about Pynchon, Dickens, and Roth.
>>8689466
I can't attest to Roth, but Pynchon and Dickens' stories only share thematic similarities. Child's novels have the exact same premise and story arc.
Unrelated, but if you genuinely enjoy them, be sure to pay attention to how often the phrase "that's for damn sure" is used until you realize how uninspired and repetitive Child is.
Bullshit.
This is Walter White.
He produced cocaine, not literature!
>>8689483
>thematic similarities
The themes are window dressing to post-modern wankery.
don't try to talk about non-meme on the board full of people who don't actually read
>>8689931
QFT
>>8689508
What?