Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Recommend fiction based on non-fiction preferences 2016-11-02 12:54:31 Post No. 8684535
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Recommend fiction based on non-fiction preferences 2016-11-02 12:54:31 Post No. 8684535
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: tjWkE6N[1].jpg (194KB, 1065x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
![tjWkE6N[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/fyyclmP.jpg "tjWkE6N[1]")
194KB, 1065x1600px
Recommend fiction based on non-fiction preferences
Anonymous
2016-11-02 12:54:31
Post No. 8684535
[Report]
Me and a couple of friends I met on /lit/ through a joint logic study group have noticed this habbit exist among people other than us too.
A lot of us (or atleast a non-insignificant number) seem to be lurking /lit/ for philosophy threads in particular, with little interest in most "literature".
I'm not sure about the others but our group here is mainly interested in logic and analytic philosophy (or, the philosophy done by most philosophers generally considered to be "analytic philosophers", I'm sure you get what I mean, let's not derail the thread)
Given these preferences, can you please recommend literary works (fiction) to us?
Pic unrelated
>>
File: 1301302639937.jpg (16KB, 250x251px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 250x251px
So you're autistic enough to hobby-study logic, but not autistic enough to stick to non-fiction, and yet again autistic enough to want fiction based on the fact that it would appeal to you as someone characterised by those interests? That's a rather narrow and zig-zag bandwidth
>>
File: 419dNNQIv-L._AC_UL320_SR222,320_.jpg (14KB, 222x320px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 222x320px
>>8684535
>>
>>8684535
Fictional works by philosophers might be a good place to start. I particularly liked Satre's No Exit.
>>
>>8684535
Obvious answer is anything by Umberto Eco or maybe Gibran
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3