Are there any charts on how to get into Schopenhauer and Nietzche?

Towards the bottom of this:

https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub

>>8661612
You don't need a chart. Schopenhauer tells you exactly what you need to read to understand him in the introduction to the world as will and representation.

You don't even really need Schopenhauer for Nietzsche, though it enhances the experience, for Nietzsche just have a good understanding of Plato/Socrates and the presocratics, Heraclitus in particular. Some general knowledge of the people he brings up all of the time (Epicurus and Kant) is also useful but not strictly necessary.

Oh also you should read the bible.

>>8661612
You start NEETtzche with The Birth of Tragedy then go in chronological order.

>>8661698
Read Attempt at Self Criticism, The Case of Wagner, Birth of Tragedy, and then the rest.

Start with the Greeks

>>8661623
Nietzsche is such a hot mess, he married phenomenology and they had Heidegger, that is 2 qt but an ordeal for sure

>>8662704
good post

>>8661612
the greeks

>>8661623
>Nietzsche ends in feminist epistemologies
Top fucking kek
Have him end with Spengler and Evola

The first philosophical text I read was Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Did I fuck up? It was kinda hard to understand, but I made sense of it. Would reading the Greeks first have helped?

>>8662907
>he doesnt know that nietzsche invented feminism
top kek indeed