So lets talk about this, /lit/
It has been a good 2 years since Iv'e read it and honestly I still don't know how to interpret the ending.
For me, the state in which we eventually find V. is a culmination of all the rumours we have heard throughout the novel. A collection of fragmented images and stories that now constitute a reality (which makes it rather modernistic imo). Stencil's quest borders lunacy as he tries to follow the trail of someone that may not even exist (or is just multiple people). The fact that he tries to find more leads even after V. Is 'destroyed' just shows how he tries to string together unrelated events, rumours and stories in what is a delusional, paranoid search for something (I imagine Veisshu).
Would love to hear your thoughts on this.
I felt the point of the ending was we're all just inanimate objects.
>>8639182
>t.potted plant
I think that you are a faggot
Everything is true
This book was really boring so by the end I was reading roughly every third word
>>8639211
as in benny's definition of animate v. inanimate objects
>>8638537
I also see in it Pynchon struggling with the idea of "plot"
Vp