What are your thoughts regarding it?
I always had a hard time understanding the content of phenomenology. I get the move of the radical bracketing to the apodictic experience. This supposedly opens up a whole horizon of study and analysis, but what is it? Where does it actually get you? How much can you actually say about intentionality or the content of your experience? I can't really make heads or tails of Merleau-Ponty. Maybe I need to smarten up and do more reading on it.
>>8633970
i really don't fucking get it at all
>>8633991
I never got as far as Merleau-Ponty, but I took Husserl to be getting towards a type of Western meditative state.
If you're looking to find an intensive study on Husserl, I highly recommend Derrida's Voice and Phenomenon.
I think it's phenomenal
>>8634260
>>8634260