Any "good" ones?
>>8633342
Yeah, the bible
>>8633353
>>8633342
Hhaahah. They hand that stuff out outside of ken ham lectures.
>>8634335
I'm Christian, but I despise ken ham
>>8634374
Same. Him and the Westboro nutters have done more damage to religion's reputation than anything else.
>>8633342
You could try Lee Strobel's Case for the Creator. But the entire thing was refuted by one chapter of the god delusion and I'm not even memeing.
>>8634374
>>8634394
My people of west African descent.
>>8634394
I wish there were more like him.
>>8633342
Not necessarily creationist but alot of the hollow earth stuff by the guy who wrote tarzan is an alright read, albeit light.
Can't really have a hollow earth if it's not /created/ but i'm stretching~
Anyone else?
There is more validity to creationism than any evolutionism.
Frankly, the ideology as a whole just seems to be institutionalized linearity; the progressive mindset is an oddity and has similarly also chosen to both make history materialist but with some supramaterial endgoal (utopia).
Taking this neo-christianity thing too far desu
Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome by Dr. J.C. Sanford
http://evolutionatbyu.com/Other/20130607Sanford,-Genetic-Entropy.pdf