>adults that defend the literary merit of Harry Potter

>believing in merit of any kind

>>8628779
>teenagers that post frogs

>Harry Potters that defend literary frogs of teenagers

>>8628781
>he doesn't post frogs
>never gonna make it

>>8628784
>posters who are autistic

>>8628784
>transplants from reddit trying to be funny

>>8628792
>accusing other's of being from reddit to conceal your own reddit

>>8628798
>trying to pull the reverse-reddit, the most reddit move of them all

>>8628792
>fun that transplates reddit into trying tribe mentalities

>>8628779
I don't know, man. Getting kids to read is a pretty good thing IMO.

>>8628779
>adults that act surprised when children's books don't turn out to be highly sophisticated literature

>>8628802
>knowing about the ol' reddit switcheroo
You make me sick.

>>8628978
You must know your enemy to destroy it

>>8628981
So that's why you've come here, eh?

>>8628985
I only know reddit for reconnaissance reasons

>>8628988
I've had this conversation with you before.

You're a slimy little spy, aren't you?

Tell me; who's the best character in AGoT?

>>8628988
of course, the scouts must know their home base.

>>8628991
I don't read plebbit tier genre fiction
>>8628993
wrong

>>8628995
xD

>>8628995
>I don't read plebbit tier genre fiction
That's all I needed to hear.

I knew you were a Redditor. Get 'im, boys!

I very rarely write this, but kill yourselves

>>8629011
no problemo

>>8628779
They don't know better. It is not their fault anon.

File: 1471567672624.jpg (165KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 640x480px

>>8629011
>being this edgy

>>8628779
>literary merit of Harry Potter

File: Pepelit.jpg (362KB, 1106x1012px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 1106x1012px

>>8628949

>Pushing actual shit instead of good kids /lit/ like the Jungle Books/etc

>>8628779
if the only books you ever read are on a certain level
then you are going to believe that certain level is the best literature has to offer.

>>8629092
What makes the Jungle Book better than Harry Potter?

I don't think it's legit not better than Harry Potter, but I do think that it's good points Harry Potter shares—though in lesser intensities.

>>8628781
>>8628798
>posting what I was gonna post

Haha yeah I know what you mean OP. I listen to what people like harold bloom say about harry potter, and even though I'm not really knowledgeable enough to compare harry potter to the major canonical works on their literary merit, I still go by what people like harold bloom say when forming my opinions. That's because it's easier to just say what smarter people than me think instead of forming opinions of my own!

>>8629092
Bloom?

>>8629601
This OP.

File: is this pleb serious.gif (453KB, 280x207px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 280x207px

>>8629092

Don't forget LOTR/Chronicles of Narnia/etc.

>>8629579

If you have to ask this question, just go ahead and read Harry Potter.

>>8629604

That's Mr Bloom to you.

>>8628779

>it's okay to read YA if you're an actual adult
>it's okay to read shit for "nostalgia"

>>8629635
Nobody here says this.

cringiest thread in the catalog right now

>>8629635
>posts on 4chan
>criticises how other people spend their time

>>8629579
it is cuter, much better written literary and has some nice children's poetry

it also doesn't really have power fantasies about being chosen, admitted to a secret society and given powers hence why it is less popular while everybody and their mother write about magic academies nowadays