Are there objective issues with books that are really long or is that just an excuse that plebs use?
How can there be objective issues if they are issues? They depend on someone to have an issue with a long book, stop being retarded
>>8626803
Depends on whether the length is actual plot or just unnecessary padding with purple prose. Read any book from the Spanish "Boom" and you'll see what I mean. Fuck this movement.
>>8626819
I'm saying, is a book being too long an issue in and of itself?
Brevity - wit
t. Wilhelm Shakespears
>>8626827
No, it's an issue for people who don't like long books and not an issue for those who like them.
>>8626824
are you including marquez? because i dont see how there was any wasted space in 100 years
>>8626803
a book with dense ideas and prose needs to be short. i dont want to spend 800 pages on sprints, i need an easy jog if im going to attempt something that long. its all personal really, but IJ just bored me.
>>8626835
Said the most longwinded character in the play
>>8626846
Nah, he's good. I'm talking about hacks like Carpentier and Cortazar.
some writers can blabber
i've heard that ayn rand is an offender but what can you expect from a smack fueled author
>>8626861
i want to learn more about the movement, even if it is shit. is there anything worthwhile or anything noteworthy i should at least look up? mainly to make my own judgement on this
would you consider don quixote to be too long for what its going for? its a fun read but does it go too far?
>>8626870
Cortazar's Hopscotch is a good place to start.