So is there any good argument for truth independent of human interpretation?
>/philosophymajors/
If you're not going to discuss literary corpus of Plato, please fuck off
That's a big question, OP.
There wouldn't be even if truth independent of human interpretation was actually a thing.
So are you saying that 13 billion years of existence before first humans didn't have any truthfulness in them
>>8624688
this thread is dumb. go put it on sci, see how theyd like it.