>nobody got the ending

what i was going for was a kind of anti-climax, where instead of a climax and a good ending that was good, i did it bad.

i wanted the reader to wonder where the ending was, and to reflect like, back on himself, and think: why do i need an ending? what's the point of an ending?

endings are arbitrary, um, constructs, and i was trying to get the reader to think about that, and think, so he could be smarter and get smart like me.

toward the end of the book it sort of all turns into gobbledygook and you cant understand any of it, but that's modern life, is it not? a bunch of gobbledygook you cant understand?

people have been asking me why i wrote a book that's 1,240 pages long and it book has no ending to it. lol. well, look around you. computers. internet. web page. digital marketplace. enron. fox news vs. msnbc. the oculus rift. the dow jones. ..... gettin the picture?

my point was to make the reader write her own ending, in her head, so she would think about the material i was conveying to her, and she would get smarter as a result of the brain connections. if youre not willing to work for your art, heh, go back to sitting on the couch i guess...

>>8617311
>her
>she

Okay you got me with that

i really wanted the ending to be ambiugous, instead of clear.

i forgot why i wanted it to be that way

So, Harry Haller died from an opiate overdose, right?

of your joke, op?

the feel when to many shit threads so I don't end up submitting a single report

File: 1456956253254.gif (2MB, 304x226px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 304x226px

Just stumbled upon this thread

pretty funny guys

>read book poorly
>get the bad ending