What are the most /lit/ magazines?

>>8610026
You're just going to end up shitposting on econjobrumors aren't you.

>>8610035
I love economics but fuck pursuing a career in it. I don't want to work an unfulfilling government job crunching numbers.

The only good econ careers are academia or top-tier consulting.

>>8610026

*snickering Marxistly* try Jacobin

>>8610026
>>8610026
I know it's not exactly /lit/ but how is "Foreign Policy" when it comes to current political events? Does anyone know?

>>8610055
Inforwars.com my friend.

>>8610051
This magazine is cancer. 100% ideology.

>>8610197
>he doesn't resist pokemon go

>>8610026
I'm only subscribed to Lapham's Quarterly.

>>8610064
I suppose that's a no

>>8610026
The short stories in The Paris Review are usualy good. The interviews are often at least interesting. I'm not such a fan of poetry so I usualy just skim it. The "portfolios" that are often included in the magazine generally do nothing for me and seem like a waste of space.

I'd recomend that you check out Tin House too. The stories are also good, and a much higher proportion of the magazine is dedicated to fiction so you get more stories per issue. I believe the subscription is less expensive too.

The New Criterion is the correct answer.

>>8610026
Highlights

The Times Literary Supplement is p good. If you read French, then la nouvelle revue d'histoire is good counter-ideology.

File: 1412288895037.png (2MB, 1805x2730px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1805x2730px

>>8610026
+foreign policy
NOT foreign affairs

File: davidfosterwallace-998x814.jpg (106KB, 998x814px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 998x814px

>>8611276
nvm, the other way around

File: make it stop.gif (746KB, 499x350px) Image search: [Google]

746KB, 499x350px

>>8611276

>God tier if your a marxist
>if your a marxist
>your a marxist
>your
>a
>marxist
>your
>a
>marxist
>YOUR
>A
>MARXIST

>>8611293

Yeah, what did you expect from subhuman retards? As you may have already figured out, the entire "guide" is terrible.

>>8611276

kys

>>8610026
http://isreview.org/issue/102

>>8611316

lol this shit is funny, these people are actually this stupid

Is the point of subscribing to get a physical copy? I can read the articles for free online so the only benefit I can see to subscribing is to support the magazine and to read something while shitting.

new criterion

>>8610197
>100% ideology.

As if they aren't all.

I know, I know, there's ideology and your own "objective" opinions, we've all been there, kiddo.

Why the hate for Foreign Affairs?

>>8610055
It's fine, Foreign Affairs is better tho.

>>8610026
Only one I can feel motivated to read cover to cover is n+1, something about their writing is super engaging, complex, and tight. I don't agree with lots of their conclusions and their arrogant attitude pisses me off now and again, but still highly recommended.