any PhD or professors of literature here?
>>8608382
no, fuck off
>>8608388
/thread
>>8608388
go back to /b/ please
nah
4 years of philosophy here
>>8608382
Yes, why?
Hi op, Harold Bloom here
>>8608382
People with PhDs have better things to be doing than talking to idiots like us on a Roman tablet forum.
>>8609226
For the love of God, don't assume people with PhDs are any less dumb or incompetent than anyone else.
>>8609262
statistically they are
>>8609262
You heard it first folks, those philosophy PhDs don't know more about philosophy than us.
>>8608382
I work at a top university here in England, I won't say which one, I'm sure the name of it instantly popped (onomatopoeia) into your discourse module.
The food here is shit
>>8609367
For some reason this post made me laugh harder than anything I have read this week. Thanks for the chuckle anon been in a shit mood.
>>8609436
And yet you just comma spliced. If you're telling the truth, it must be a subject with a lower IQ threshold for teaching staff. Something like anthropology, which I studied. I flunked, but some of the staff were big time pseuds.
profesor tutaj
>>8609271
No, they really aren't.
t. PhD
Professor but not yet PhD here.
>>8610567
statistically they are
>>8610585
The statisticians involved may or may not be PhDs, it really doesn't matter.
t. dog
>>8610567
the true horror of reality is knowing that no matter how far up the echelons of academia you go, everyone will still be retarded
>>8608382
My PhD (pretty hairy dick) was in your mom's pussy last night, nerd.
>>8608382
yup. phd english. focused on romantics.
what's it to ya?
>>8612617
Grammarian here, is "pretty" modifying "hairy" or is it modifying "dick" in this case?
>>8612664
If you were an actual grammarian you would know pretty's modifying hairy.