What is the most /lit/ non-comic picture book?

Oh, The Places You'll Go by Dr. Seuss has strong existential themes.

File: IMG_0224.png (3MB, 960x1274px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x1274px

Anything from the Taschen collection

File: download.jpg (10KB, 200x252px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x252px

Anything by this dude

>>8609469
Another one of his

File: images.jpg (5KB, 149x126px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 149x126px

>>8609472
Forgot pic

File: images.jpg (13KB, 240x210px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 240x210px

>>8609474
A page

>>8609479
>exhausting this much effort responding to obvious bait

oyasumi punpun

>>8609469
>gnome sex
Do they actually show gnomes having sex?

File: IMG_0031.jpg (270KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1000x1000px

How is this a question?

Anything by Shel Silverstein.

>>8609550
You formulated a referring expression that elicits a request for information.

>>8608184
The voynich manuscript: so /lit/ that no one understands it.

All of these fall under the definitions of comics used by Will Eisner and Scott McCloud.

>>8609558
u got me there

>>8609565
You'd be fun at parties.

File: dc-special-series-15.jpg (537KB, 920x1368px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 920x1368px

>>8609565
DC's even published two Batman issues that are in the formats posted in this thread instead of your normal superhero comic.

>>8608184
Anything William Blake, gorgeous art, magnificent poems. Both by the same genius.

>>8609565
Probably falls under this technically, but:
Leonardo's diary desu senpai

>>8609576
>/lit/ constantly shits on comics when asked about them
>anon asks for comics but not THOSE comics
>other anon calls him out on it
>has no counter argument so resorts to insults

>>8610021
>is a pedant.
>would be fun at parties.

>>8609565
Except for the post directly above yours, faggot.

File: Voynich_Manuscript_(123).jpg (136KB, 1536x750px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1536x750px

>>8610037
Not in its entirety and certainly not in the herbal sections of the manuscript but the parts that appear to be about astronomy, zodiac signs and cosmology sure seem like sequential images to me.

>>8609469
Thank you for reminding myself of my dear infancy that the years would no longer bring. I loved this book with all my soul. It made the woods and nature far more magical to my child eyes.

>>8609565
Those definitions are fucking retarded

>>8608184
Shrek.

>>8608184
Illustrated Paradise Lost

File: wilks_s_lg.jpg (2MB, 2500x1930px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2500x1930px

S