I'm a complete secularist with an interest in the book that seems to have guided western civilization for 2000 years.
Should I get the KJV or the Oxford Annotated? Assuming I get the KJV, which translation is best?
>>8608153
>KJV
>which translation
I just bought Oxford. Someone else was posting about buying it too. We should start a study group.
>>8608171
Does the KJV get young, Christian women excited? I need to know which copy to keep on my bookshelf when I take them home.
Any other recs for bible prowess related to picking up prudish pussy?
>>8608153
KJV for literary interest
ASMR and Lattimor for study
>Assuming I get the KJV, which translation is best?
KJV is the translation, boyo.
Oxford Annotated if you plan to read the OT in full
KJV makes the Pentateuch torture, sorry
KJV is nice for /lit/, and I definitely think people should get around to reading it at some point in their life (or at least, reading their favorite passages in the KJV's language).
As is, it's not a great translation by today's standards.
The New Oxford Annotated uses the NRSV as a base, and the NRSV (or New Revised Standard Version) is widely considered the best for study. So, yes, it's a good choice.
Like it was said in the other Bible thread, the runners-up are probably: Revised Standard Version (RSV), New American Bible (NAB), and New English Translation or NET Bible. I personally like and use the NET Bible, since the main version is free online, filled with notes, and can be used as a "Study Bible" by itself.